• Help Support The Rugby Forum :

[2013-14 IRB 7's] Gold Coast

dudeabides

Academy Player
Joined
May 17, 2010
Messages
384
Country Flag
United States
Club or Nation
United States
Watch free and live here, if it works in your nation: http://www.irbsevens.com/liveblog/blogid=1854.html

The International Rugby Board, in conjunction with tournament organisers the Australian Rugby Union, has announced the pools and match schedule for round one of the HSBC Sevens World Series 2013/14, the Gold Coast Sevens.

In just over one month, the tournament will be staged for a third time at Skilled Park on the Gold Coast, where hosts Australia have been drawn to face Samoa, Argentina and Scotland in pool play on day one on Saturday 12 October. The Australians will be attempting to win a home Sevens ***le for the first time since 2002 in Brisbane.

Pool A
New Zealand
Kenya
USA
Tonga

Pool B
South Africa
England
France
Spain

Pool C
Fiji
Wales
Canada
Portugal

Pool D
Samoa
Australia
Argentina
Scotland

As defending HSBC Sevens World Series champions, New Zealand head Pool A in Australia and will face Kenya, USA and regional qualifiers Tonga, who are the only non-core team.

Last season's runners-up South Africa line up top of Pool B and face matches against a triumvirate of European challengers, England, France and Spain.

Defending Gold Coast champions Fiji head Pool C and face matches against Wales, Canada and Portugal.

As the fourth-ranked team in 2012/13, the Samoans are the top seed in Pool D and face hosts Australia, Argentina and Scotland.

The IRB's new General Manager for Rugby Sevens Avan Lee was present at the draw in London with HSBC's head of Rugby sponsorship Andrea de Vincentiis and IRB's Head of Commercial, Broadcast and Marketing Murray Barnett, and believes that the Gold Coast event marks the start of the three most important seasons for the sport.

"This is a pivotal time for Rugby Sevens with three years until our debut at the Olympic Games and the Gold Coast is an exciting and eye-catching place for the HSBC Sevens World Series to kick off," said Lee.

"The Series is growing as a sporting brand all the time, attracting hundreds of thousands through the turnstiles around the world and millions more on TV. Working with the Australian Rugby Union and the eight other hosts I'm sure we're in for another superb season."

Pool draw process 2013/14
While the top four seeds for the Gold Coast draw were based on the final Series standings for 2012/13, during the rest of the 2013/14 season the teams will be placed and drawn as follows:

- The Cup winner, runner-up, 3rd-placed and 4th-placed team at each round will be placed top of Pools A, B, C and D respectively for the next round, then
- Teams placed 5th to 8th will be drawn into Band 2, with the first drawn team allocated second in Pool A, then B etc
- Teams placed 9th to 12th will be drawn into Band 3, with the first drawn team allocated third in Pool A, then B etc
- Teams placed 13th, 14th, 15th, together with the one invitational team, will be drawn into Band 4, with the first drawn team allocated fourth in Pool A, then B etc.

For Round 1 of the HSBC Sevens World Series 2013/14, the Gold Coast Sevens, teams were placed and banded based on the final standings of the 2012/2013 Series.

1. New Zealand
2. South Africa
3. Fiji
4. Samoa
5. Kenya
6. England
7. Wales
8. Australia
9. France
10. Argentina
11. USA
12. Canada
13. Scotland
14. Portugal
15. Spain
* Tonga are the regional qualifier for the FORU (Oceania) region


http://www.irbsevens.com/destinatio...2068729.html#draw+announced+gold+coast+sevens
 
Last edited:
Fantastic news out of the IRB today...all 7's events will be streamed LIVE!!!! On their official channel....as well the promotion and relegation has changed, the winner of a qualifier tournament at Hong Kong 7's will replaced the lowest ranked core team at years end.
 
Can't decide if I wanna make the hour and a half trip to go watch. Or stay at home and play GTA V
 
Ouch still reeling from that NZ/USA match, even though you'd have to know how it was going to be beforehand but seeing it's worse.
 
New Zealand into another final. They were certainly pushed by England though, who look a far better side than last season - their defense was particularly impressive. We had a few calls that went our way which I felt was the main difference between the two sides....

EDIT: The South Africa v Australia game was a cracker! Australia pulled off the victory after almost 10 minutes of extra time. Australia should have won it it much earlier in extra time, but the young Aussie 11 blew it by going himself rather than make the simple pass (he did make the final pas for the last try though!). I felt South Africa were very harshly dealt with by the ref. They had a man sent to the bin (for an offense at the breakdown) despite him not actually being penalized for the offense (as it was advantage over - the game stopped 40m up-field for a knock-on). I'm not actually sure what the ref did was within the laws of the game?
 
Last edited:
The final had me worried, my beloved allblacks down 12-0. An awesome game and comeback. props to the Ausies for managing to put on 19 points even after that semi against the Blitzbokke.

Time for a bit of a rant.Does anyone else get annoyed by how much the commentators talk up Carlin Isles? In all fairness he is very, very quick but his defence is mediocre at best and his passing is atrocious. I do recognize him as a prestigious talent but he still has someway to go!
Rant over.
 
The final had me worried, my beloved allblacks down 12-0. An awesome game and comeback. props to the Ausies for managing to put on 19 points even after that semi against the Blitzbokke.

Time for a bit of a rant.Does anyone else get annoyed by how much the commentators talk up Carlin Isles? In all fairness he is very, very quick but his defence is mediocre at best and his passing is atrocious. I do recognize him as a prestigious talent but he still has someway to go!
Rant over.

I get what you mean about Carlin Isles. In reality he isn't near the best player in the USA team. He's a guy whose most outstanding attribute is his achievement in another sport - but you'll find that the commentators always give more attention to guys who have achieved noteriety in other sports. Before Carlin Isles they wouldn't stop talking about Miles Craidwell because he was in the NFL. I like both of them as players, but no they haven't earned the hype. That said I still like to see them play, as Isles is if nothing else entertaining. Although you listen to him speak and he comes off as the most self-loving poser I've heard.

On a side note - does anyone else think if Jamaica put together a team of sprinters that didn't make the Olympics and put them through a year of intensive rugby training - they'd be somewhat entertaining?
 
Last edited:
I get what you mean about Carlin Isles. In reality he isn't near the best player in the USA team. He's a guy whose most outstanding attribute is his achievement in another sport - but you'll find that the commentators always give more attention to guys who have achieved noteriety in other sports. Before Carlin Isles they wouldn't stop talking about Miles Craidwell because he was in the NFL. I like both of them as players, but no they haven't earned the hype. That said I still like to see them play, as Isles is if nothing else entertaining. Although you listen to him speak and he comes off as the most self-loving poser I've heard.

On a side note - does anyone else think if Jamaica put together a team of sprinters that didn't make the Olympics and put them through a year of intensive rugby training - they'd be somewhat entertaining?

Yes, isles is definitely entertaining to watch. And yes that Jamaican sprint team would be awesome to watch, although still they probably would not be the best team in the competition.
What about a team of the fastest current sevens players (forwards would be a problem so I am excluding them)

1. Carlin Isles
2. Dan Norton
3. Collins Injera
4. Shannon Walker
5. Simpie Mastriet
6. That realy fast new guy for the Blitzbokke.
7. Samisona (excuse spelling) viriviri

Any others I've missed.
 
Happy with that showing for England, with their new head coach. Third place, with a 47 - 0 hammering of South Africa (and a cheeky win over Ben Ryan's Fiji).

Also great to see Dan Bibby heavily involved - turned out a couple of times for our 'A' side, as well as playing for us in the JP Morgan 7s last year.
 
Yes, isles is definitely entertaining to watch. And yes that Jamaican sprint team would be awesome to watch, although still they probably would not be the best team in the competition.
What about a team of the fastest current sevens players (forwards would be a problem so I am excluding them)

1. Carlin Isles
2. Dan Norton
3. Collins Injera
4. Shannon Walker
5. Simpie Mastriet
6. That realy fast new guy for the Blitzbokke.
7. Samisona (excuse spelling) viriviri

Any others I've missed.

Walker has a great step and acceleration - but he never looks especially quick at full pace. In fact he's been caught from behind a few times this tournament. Injera would be there 3-4 seasons ago, great player but I wouldn't say the top 10 in the series (at a guess anyway).
 
I only saw the AB's vs Kenya and they looked superb. Not surprised to see they won it.
 
The final had me worried, my beloved allblacks down 12-0. An awesome game and comeback. props to the Ausies for managing to put on 19 points even after that semi against the Blitzbokke.

Time for a bit of a rant.Does anyone else get annoyed by how much the commentators talk up Carlin Isles? In all fairness he is very, very quick but his defence is mediocre at best and his passing is atrocious. I do recognize him as a prestigious talent but he still has someway to go!
Rant over.

He's not a good rugby player, he's just freaking quick, entertaining to watch! But anyone that thinks his success on the 7s circuit would transfer across to 15 a side rugby doesn't know much about the game!
 
Didn't bother going, ticket prices at $54 each was ridicoulous, with 4 of us going would have been far to much for damn Seven's.... went to the beach instead :p
 
Didn't bother going, ticket prices at $54 each was ridicoulous, with 4 of us going would have been far to much for damn Seven's.... went to the beach instead :p

...dude, that's nothing compared to what I pay to go to the Wellington 7's.
 
This is Australian dollars though :p plus that's $54 for one day.. It used to be like $20 for a day.

It's $200 for a weekend here - I think its $100 a day (which even with the worst exchange rate doesn't = $54). That said the Wellington 7's is probably more of an event to be honest.
 
Wellington 7's looks like it has a good atmoshphere. Gold Coast 7's is more just an event. No one really cares.
 
Super RugbyFixturesWallabiesLions TourRugby ChampionshipInternationalRugby RSSIs the ARU ignoring a rugby sevens gold mine? Roar Rookie By Rugby stu, 18 Jan 2014 Rugby stu is a Roar Rookie

Tagged: Bill Pulver, Rugby sevens, Rugby Union
57 Have your say
Email . + enlarge image Aussie Thunderbolts captain Ed Jenkins wearing the lime kit of the Australian Sevens team (Photo: Australian Rugby)

Related coverage
Rugby Union news
Since the announcement of the new National Rugby Championship, rugby posts on The Roar have been more like reading the Financial Times or Forbes magazine, with each group presenting different business proposition to stop the downward trend many supporters feel the game is locked in.

It's no secret rugby supporters have their minds on money and money on their minds.

Much of this is due to both the precarious nature of rugby's finances and major expectations on what a new comp will be and what it will do for the game.

There is major debate about how this comp will work, in particular between tradition and financial viability.

Some feel the NRC could risk destroying tradition and create 'plastic franchises', alienating any real grassroots community involvement.

Others don't care as long as the model is financially viable; the benefits must be high and the costs low.

Neither group is wrong.

Many of Australia's 15-a-side rugby clubs have some of the longest, proudest histories around. For example Brisbane's GPS club was founded in 1887 and Sydney's Uni Club 1863.

Many of these clubs live off the smell of an oily rag, are antiquated, family oriented, live off the passion of local volunteers and this breeds a unique culture but one that can clash with commercialisation.

It's also a no-brainer rugby needs money and 'tradition has to start somewhere'.

This 'irresistible force meets an immovable object' situation puts the NRC in a precarious situation of having to be the great saviour, as it has to be 'all things to all men'.

People disagree on what teams should be involved, whether they should be privately run, whether the 'big money' clubs should be allowed in.

It has to be for development, it must have mass appeal.

Some have written it all off before it has even had a chance.

Meanwhile, cricket is going gangbusters.

Sports fans generally have short memories but prior to this year's ashes and the BBL revolution, many people saw cricket as having many of the same problems and issues as rugby.

Cricket was looking a little haggard, riding a declining trend, with the national team in free-fall.

There was a real possibility of cricket falling down Australia's perceived sporting pecking order.

Facing issues with how to revitalise interest in domestic competition, a national team on the nose and, as always, there were issues with Test cricket's mass marketability versus its tradition.

Twenty 20 cricket in its pre-history was looked at with derision as 'hit and giggle' and many felt threatened the affect it could have on the fabric and structure of the beloved game.

Cricket in one super season has shown tradition and mass marketing commercialism can coexist as a strong one-two combination.

But as George Costanza would say, "you've gotta keep your worlds apart!"

Rugby parallels cricket quite remarkably.

15-a-side rugby, like Test cricket is built on strong, tradition, history and culture. You will find many articles written by purists of both these games speaking of them a la a symphony.

Games full of complexity and tactics that demand patience, savvy. They are full of ebb and flow, peak and valley; they are not always pretty, nor are they suited to the tiny attention span of the casual viewer.

Would Australians ever go for rugby sevens?

Rugby sevens is one of the fastest growing team sports on earth; it has seen a meteoric rise on a global scale, breaking into markets 15-a-side could only dream about.

It is a game where Kenya, Portugal and Spain could on their day beat New Zealand, England and Australia and it plays a large, lucrative World Series in Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, Scotland, England, Japan, Hong Kong, UAE and Las Vegas.

I took my family earlier this year to the Gold Coast Sevens finals and it was one of the best days of rugby – nay, entertainment – I had been too in a long time.

It was great bang for my buck, a lively carnival/party atmosphere. The crowd are part of the entertainment with things like 'kiss cam' and 'dance cam' and we laughed until breathless at the costumes and antics of drunken rugby fans.

The action on the field too was nail-biting; games were close, full of running rugby at its purist (running rugby in Australia, that won't work).

The Australia versus South Africa semi-final saw Australia force a long, back-and-forth, nail-biting, extra-time contest
before a classic come from behind clinching Aussie try.

The final, Australia versus New Zealand, had a pulsating atmosphere as the home boys went down valiantly.

Honestly, I thought if the ARU can't sell this, well then it's time to pull the plug, sell the farm and move to New Zealand.

For whatever reason, sevens seems to have been neglected in Australia and resources have been directed at trying to bash the game's head against a 15-a-side brick wall.

But cricket has now kicked down the door and set a clear template. League too, embarrassingly, is beating rugby to the punch by jumping on the lucrative bandwagon with their nines tournament.

It's time to face facts, to a large portion of the Australian public rugby 15-a-side is 'yawnion', dominated by piggies, complicated rucks, kicking, old boys and stuffy exclusive private school toffs and no matter how brilliant or eloquent your line of reasoning may be, you will never get through and convince people otherwise.

The beauty of T20 is it is unencumbered by tradition; it can throw off any prehistoric shackles. With no legacy to stick too, it is free to be innovative, given license to take itself less seriously and just simply entertain.

With rugby sevens you get pretty much the same thing. It can throw off the yawnion shackles with its short, quick, rapid-fire, eminently marketable action.

While five day Tests and T20 are starting to build a bit of integration and harmony, rugby sevens and 15-a-side seem to be going in severely divergent trajectories.

Once upon a time 15-a-side players such as Tim Horan, David Campese and Jonah Lomu mixed it up in seven-a-side with great success but now they say the games are too physically different for this to occur. That is crap.

If you were to scan through the extensive playing rosters of the Super Rugby you can't tell me there are none fleet of foot and with the capacity to train and play sevens.

So as Bill Pulver puts down the balance sheet he has been puzzlingly staring at and accidentally clicks on to the BBL he most likely thinks:

"Damn I'm stressed about the new NRC and its success, how we are going to fund it into the future? I wish we had a popular smaller version of the game like this in which we could use as a cash cow in a similar fashion.

"I know! We just need lots of entertaining running rugby without costing us victory, the Wallabies to win the Bledisloe cup, the Waratahs to revitalise and win the Super Rugby, the Rebels to make the finals and gain support of disgruntled AFL supporters, the players to put the national jersey above earning three times their value and we need the ancient prophecies to come true.

"If none of that happens, we can play a hybrid game with a rugby team that no longer exists!"

(Small disclaimer: Pulver is actually a big believer in sevens).

Rugby sevens unleashes a whole raft of possibilities for the code.

Legitimate cross code games with a reduced possibility of well… death, reduced costs for playing rosters, private ownership franchises, attracting foreign interest, breaking eligibility issues, grabbing fair weather fans and pushing up the market value of rugby for free-to-air television.

Furthermore it could integrate some of the unknown sevens players with some of the Wallabies stars.

There has been a lot of talk about some the games big stars possibly being on the biggest stage of them all the huge 2015 Olympics, but sevens coaches have said they want a staunch commitment.

If there was a big, televised, Australian BBL-style sevens competition some of the big boys could legitimately test their mettle.

The beauty of this comp is, unlike the NRC which is near impossible to get right, a sevens BBL is hard to get wrong.

The ARU could test the water for the NRC teams, they could chuck in Super teams – it doesn't really matter, as long as the money is there.

In BBL style, they could cry havoc and let slip the marketers of war.

Sevens has developed followings in non-rugby strongholds: Adelaide had a major taste for sevens during the World Series and Darwin apparently has "the richest rugby sevens tournament in the Southern Hemisphere" with the "Hottest sevens in the world".

It's not a huge stretch to see sevens attracting more youth interest due to parents being put off by the dangerous nature of 15-a-side rugby, growing interest with the fringes of both league and AFL fans and players alike.

The ARU needs to act before sevens become less an asset and more a divergent, serious rival.

The money gained from a domestic sevens could be pumped into grassroots rugby, the NRC and help Pulver to stop checking his horoscope and staring at the ARU balance sheet and praying to the gods of rugby for the planets to align.

I'm sure I must be missing something and others have written similar articles.

Are there contract issues? IRB issues? Crowded schedules? Lack of public interest? Damage to 15-a-side?

I am interested to hear Roarers' opinions.
 

Latest posts

Top