Wales online heading "Wayne Barnes helped make this a classic". When the winners are singing the refs praises you know how he performed
I really can't understand how people with a good understanding of the game didn't see the constant stream of Welsh Players lying on the wrong side of the ruck making no attempt to roll away.
Perhaps people were more engrossed in the game or haven't taken the time to properly asses what was going on but it was clear as ****ing day and he hadn't the brass to call them out on it.
I'm not saying we don'tIf you think your own back row havent don't that and got away with it this tournament then you're not entirely compos mentis dude!
I really can't understand how people with a good understanding of the game didn't see the constant stream of Welsh Players lying on the wrong side of the ruck making no attempt to roll away.
Perhaps people were more engrossed in the game or haven't taken the time to properly asses what was going on but it was clear as ****ing day and he hadn't the brass to call them out on it.
Its not an absoulte, and that is the reason why referees sometimes don't seem to be consistent. If a player on the wrong side of the tackle is not actually preventing quick ball, the referee may deem it immaterial, and if the quick ball comes, where is the problem with that?
Also, the illegal player make take some action that while it is not actually rolling away, nevertheless, gets him out of the way of the ball. For example, a tackler ends up on the wrong side with his legs trapped and his torso between the ball and where the SH will want to stand. That player swings his upper body and arms away to expose the ball. I would take that is an attempt to comply as best he can and I would not expect the referee to penalise him if clean ball was available.
I understand where you're coming from yes but the scrumhalf was being impeded , not in getting the ball out all the time but from actually getting to the base of the ruck , the amount of times I saw reddan or Murray have to stumble over a welsh torso to get to the base was massively infuriating.Its not an absoulte, and that is the reason why referees sometimes don't seem to be consistent. If a player on the wrong side of the tackle is not actually preventing quick ball, the referee may deem it immaterial, and if the quick ball comes, where is the problem with that?
Also, the illegal player make take some action that while it is not actually rolling away, nevertheless, gets him out of the way of the ball. For example, a tackler ends up on the wrong side with his legs trapped and his torso between the ball and where the SH will want to stand. That player swings his upper body and arms away to expose the ball. I would take that is an attempt to comply as best he can and I would not expect the referee to penalise him if clean ball was available.
I understand where you're coming from yes but the scrumhalf was being impeded , not in getting the ball out all the time but from actually getting to the base of the ruck , the amount of times I saw reddan or Murray have to stumble over a welsh torso to get to the base was massively infuriating.
That's a strawman. Because it may have occurred at times doesn't make the constant , and I repeat constant infringement by Welsh players in key instances in the final quarter of the game in any way acceptable.Webb was also impeded and also the Irish forwards were guilty of holding Welsh players to prevent them from rolling. Barnes did warn Ireland about this but did not follow through on his warnings.
That's a strawman. Because it may have occurred at times doesn't make the constant , and I repeat constant infringement by Welsh players in key instances in the final quarter of the game in any way acceptable.
Any ref with any form of testicles or at the very least principle would have done something.
I don't know I was ****ed last night when I got homeHows that a strawman!?
Ireland played 14 minutes of the game against 14 men, their net gain in points? 0We all agree that Barnes was more lenient in the second half that the first. Can we agree that it cost Ireland more since Ireland dominated possession and territory. It was a one score game remember and as bad as Ireland were, they were awarded one more penalty despite having double possession and a stronger scrum. You know how a ref performed when the winners are singing his praises.
Because the context of the penalties is more important than merely giving them.Just watched the match. That too me was actually incredible reffing, he made that the game it was just like Owens did for the SA v NZ match. But I didn't think he was biased to Wales or Ireland, I think that he just favoured the attacking team and Wales started so strongly. But how he can be considered biased too Wales is weird when he yellowed 2 guys and gave a similar amount of penalties against both.
I wouldn't because we were winning. and 10 games on the trot.Ireland played 14 minutes of the game against 14 men, their net gain in points? 0
That's far more important than anything else, Ireland's biggest problem is their attacking threat comes from penalties. They've scored 4 tries all tournament and especially the last two weeks never really looked like scoring one.
To be honest I'd be more worried about that as an Ireland fan than any perceived issues with the ref.