lucky number 7
International
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2010
- Messages
- 5,251
- Country Flag
- Club or Nation
Lifting up the couch was all the weights I did as a chap ...used to feel like some boss
How tall's his dad? cause I know boys who did heavy weights and bench pressed around 80kgs at 13 and are now 6'6 and still do heavy weights...
It must just be a coincidence then however I would say that heavy weight training is not as great as people say. As the case in many of my friends in school they have become extremely strong through extensive weight training and have large muscles, can beat anyone in arm wrestling matches, do 100 press ups in a few minutes etc. however these people are not any more powerful on the rugby pitch because their strength is not controlled or explosive. Rugby is more about power and physical endurance than pure muscle strength.
Power is reflected through strength. If I can squat 100kg and someone else can only squat 50kg, my upper limit for the amount of power my legs can produce is greater than his. And it's easy to combine weight training with things that make one more explosive.
Yes but pure stength is not completely helpful for rugby. For example your point would suggest that a professional muscle man would be brilliant a physical ball carrying rugby but I can guarantee you they would not be because although they have unbelievable stength their power is not centred and their muscle endurance is not designed for rugby purposes and therefore their strength would not transfer to power in terms of rugby because their balance would not be accurate for the sport meaning that their stength is irrelevant and overdone for rugby.
Yes but pure stength is not completely helpful for rugby. For example your point would suggest that a professional muscle man would be brilliant a physical ball carrying rugby but I can guarantee you they would not be because although they have unbelievable stength their power is not centred and their muscle endurance is not designed for rugby purposes and therefore their strength would not transfer to power in terms of rugby because their balance would not be accurate for the sport meaning that their stength is irrelevant and overdone for rugby.
Bad.As to the original focus of this thread, I compete in strongman competitions in the offseason. Yes, that's me in my avatar. I also spend a lot of time fishing, hunting, shooting, and I like woodworking when I have a spare moment.
You're fighting a losing battle. You know nothing of exercise physiology or kinesiology and your arguments are purely anecdotal and spurious.
Proper weight training will translate to improved performance in ANY AND EVERY SPORT (even golf, sadly). The key is to have the proper routine for rugby. Performing a bodybuilding routine will result sarcoplasmic hypertrophy, which will produce big, but useless muscles. Performing a strict powerlifting routine will result in a higher development of Type IIb muscle fibers, which are good for short, very powerful bursts of activity but are absolute **** for endurance.
Muscular endurance and explosive power can both be trained in the same athlete, but doing so simultaneously is near impossible. The best method to achieve the best of both worlds is to have a properly periodized program with power training in the offseason, gradually shifting to fitness and speed work in the preseason. The optimal type of training for rugby (once you have developed the necessary strength base) is strongman type training.
Weight training is simply a tool in building the ultimate athlete and different types of weight training yield different results. The biggest problem is that most athletes don't know how to train and worse yet, have no idea how to properly program their training for optimal results. Sadly, many strength and conditioning coaches are sorely lacking in this department as well.
As to the original focus of this thread, I compete in strongman competitions in the offseason. Yes, that's me in my avatar. I also spend a lot of time fishing, hunting, shooting, and I like woodworking when I have a spare moment.
What do you shoot?
Looking into getting a new gun for clay shooting that will dual as a hunter when needs be any advice on a fairly tight budget ?
Well Semi Auto is legal only except limited to one in the chamber and two loaded .I shoot pretty much everything and anything I can get my hands on. I personally own a
-Hi Standard K1200 (12 ga)
-Remington 870 magnum (12 ga)
-Lee-Enfield Type I Mk III (.303 British)
-Marlin XT-17 (.22LR)
-Ithaca Flue (12 ga side-by-side)
-Winchester 1300 (12 ga)
-Ruger 10/22 (.22LR semi auto)
-I had a Winchester 1400 (12 ga semi auto), but I lost it at the bottom of a river when the boat capsized
I'm also in the process of acquiring a Springfield XDm compact in .9mm
What's legal for you guys to own over there? If you want to shoot clays and also hunt, a Remington 870 is going to be your best bet. They're relatively cheap, reliable, and they're built like a tank. They're also easy to clean and completely break down if you need to.
Well Semi Auto is legal only except limited to one in the chamber and two loaded .
Was thinking about a nice over and under Will have a look at the 870 now
Big fan of the ruger 10/22 but need something for the crows...they are sly as hell out here and are in the air long before I can cop them with a rifle.
Get the 870 Super Mag. It's a beautiful gun. You can chamber anything from 2 3/4" to 3 1/2" and you're going the need the extra oomph to reach out and touch the crows. They aren't stupid.
And semi-auto is only legal with one in the pipe and two in the mag? That's stupid.