Worcester?I should also point out that there are rumours another prem club is about to announce major financial issues and not paying players or suppliers.
It does hurt a little at the moment. I think we will be fine but do think Richardson is scrambling for additional investment and a solution to the ground issue.
That'd be my guess - though didn't Newcastle withhold money players recently too?Worcester?
Worcester?
Well, actually Warwickshire and Worcestershire problems, as Coventry is and always will be in Warwickshire, no matter what the regional management bods sayWest Midlands problems
Good opportunity to drop number of prem teams (11 is a bad number to have tho) Better for player welfare. Could shift fixtures so you get similar number of games available to be televised. And doubt Bt would be bothered too much about warriors not being around to be televised.Ok, so hypothetically if nothing is done to save Wasps or Worcester, how does that affect other clubs as many are also treading water at best? For example I imagine the tv revenues would be affected as BT have less games the could show. Also each team would lose 2 match days worth or revenue. It's also a lot of negative publicity which could affect sales.
10 is a good number, 8 would be better but in the realms of turkeys voting for Christmas.Good opportunity to drop number of prem teams (11 is a bad number to have tho) Better for player welfare. Could shift fixtures so you get similar number of games available to be televised. And doubt Bt would be bothered too much about warriors not being around to be televised.