If I can make what might be considered a slightly controversial comment, on now having seen 4 matches on this tour, all of which the lions could arguably have lost. I suggest to you that there are simply not enough winners in this lions squad. Past lions tours have come on the heels of better overall 6 nations performances by both Wales and Ireland, while England have been the most consistently competitive side, if not winning the 6N as regularly as that comment would suggest. The result has been better overall quality of players throughout the squad.
While it is clear the side that beat crusaders is perhaps slightly better, it is still fair to say they still rather could not put the requisite distance between themsleves, and a weakened NZ provincial side, to win comfortably. Both victories and defeats have been close. Perhaps this is a decent measure of their chances in tests, but I just don't see the Lions being able to step it up, the required level, when it comes to the tests. It's going to be intreresting to witness, but on evidence, the outlook is not great. The lions makeshift 15 losing to a pretty makeshift highlanders outfit, is pretty damning, in my book.
There were some ok lions performers last night, but just not enough mettle in the side to secure a comfortable spread. In the end, the lions were masters of their own downfall. In quick succession, a howler of a knock on by Payne on the restart, let the highlanders back into it. The subsequent missed touch from a penalty by Biggar, and AWJ caught offside at a line out, put paid to them being unable to secure the necessary field position.
Yeah the ref may have influenced one or two things last night, but the lions were poor again in the tight 5. Not as dominant as I we might expect in a lions side. Henderson and llawes were ok, but behind the front 3, they start most of their game on the back foot, as does the back row. I actually like Haskell, but he is a good performer In a good England side, but not a leader for a lions side. As for warburton, I just don't think he's got the required quality. His first touch of note, came on the 34 minute mark. Someone will point to his try, but the graft had already been done. Thought him invisible. No authority and lost in a crowd in this type of match. Stander far more obvious with touches and runs. Thought our centres ok last night. Joseph looked dangerous at times, but his pace is rarely exploited by the lions tactics. In a NZ team, he'd be better utilized. Our wingers are just average. Not sure I rate any of them. Same with our full backs. While I am not a fan, I think a player like the England fullback (Brown) would have given the side last night an added dimension. Instead, outside Joseph, it was all a bit average out wide.
Before the game finished last night, my conclusion was that, even if the lions had won, this was still not a good enough performance. Credit to the opposition must be given. The Lions have no easy games on this tour, so difficult for them to stop and take stock at any time. Injuries also starting to mount up too. Things are not going to get any easier.
As for player I'd expect to see in tests, based on what I have seen, in 4 matches.
Front row - honestly do not know - perhaps Vunipola, but not because of his scrummaging. Owens line out throwing has been accurate.
Locks Itoje
Back row Felatau,Stander and SOB have stood out
9 Murray
10 farrell
Centres T'eo and Joseph on evidence.
Not sure the other positions will be filled with players who believe they can win when they go on the park.