- Joined
- Mar 30, 2010
- Messages
- 5,744
- Country Flag
- Club or Nation
Is it just me or is this an even weaker side than the one that faced the NPBs. Keep in mind I don't really follow NH rugby outside of tours, what are the NH poster's thoughts?
The only obvious improvements from the previous team that I can see with my scrub SH eyes are Cole, both Locks and perhaps the back three.
That said (sorry Blues fans) I don't have a huge amount of faith in this Blues team, they are serial underperformers with a lot of wasted potential. I fully expect the Lions to take this but if they bring the same weak s%#& the brought against the Baba's they will be in for a very tough game.
I don't think so actually, I think based on the units, most of which have played together before, this is a better team. Or at least I like it more. That doesn't mean player by player it's better but I think they should play like they've at least met each other before, unlike the other team.
Caveat though; this team is not going to score a bunch of tries, and wouldn't against many teams especially at such an early point in the tour. They will look to play with a tighter structure and not take too many risks. We will kick a lot and not try and run the Blues around too much. Gatland will hope that we win the territorial battle and the blues try and run it from silly parts of the field - we then punish them for that.
The major weaknesses are Biggar, Haskell (I don't rate his current form) and how Halfpenny interacts - or doesn't - with his wingers.
Strengths are that this is defensively just about the strongest side we have, apart from the halfbacks. Also, nearly the best front row we could muster.