- Joined
- Nov 2, 2006
- Messages
- 6,180
- Country Flag
I reckon Beck could play 13. Although I only put him there due to lack of options though. Hook isn't an outside centre either. Besides it would be good for Beck's career if he could use this to play 13 as it will help him in breaking into the Wales team properly in the future.
I do agree regarding the lack of 13's, and it'd be nice to have another option there. But I'm not sure about Beck there. Imo he's an out and out 12 and his entire skillset suits the inside centre position. I've always felt that a 13 needs some pace, something that Beck and Henson lack (although Hook's top end speed isn't great, he does glide about a pitch). Looking at all the other options we have, or will have, Jon Davies, Roberts, Scott Williams, Owen Williams and Cory Allen all have some pace about them (they could all do a job on the wing for example).
Granted that the class of Henson and Beck in the centres would probably be enough against Japan, If the back three were used cleverly, then it could be an interesting test, but just as I feel the balance of a back-row is more important than the sum of its parts, I feel the same about the midfield axis (10, 12, 13).
But if there isn't anything on the line, then by that logic all the Autumn/June internationals are "meaningless".
Comparing the Autumn/June internationals with a competition, then yes they are more meaningless (note, not totally meaningless, that was my fault initially). This tour to Japan will be a development tour, the JWC is also a development competition, but with more on the line, and more pressure involved.
In regards to the Raeburn Shield, I actually think Wales should big up it's importance now they have it. They'll never win a RWC, so it will be the only claim to being the world's best they get.
It's awesome to be in possession of it (as well as the TRF shield), but its only a gimmick in reality. It doesn't mean we can claim to be the best at anything.
I'm not saying you are necessarily wrong but U20's are still a long way from their peak performance both mentally and physically. The full national teams are selected over the best of 15 age groups not just 1. I think the matches you see at full adult level and U20 level are a different type to be honest.
Remember Japan, Canada and Georgia etc really aren't so far behinds the likes of Italy, Samoa, Tonga etc. Japan only lost by 1 point last year to a Samoa team that included the likes of Fotuali'i, Cencus Johnston, Tekori, Paul Williams, Paulo, Mulipola, Lemi etc. And also led Italy at half time away from home in 2011 until the scrum took the game away from them. Some think there is a giant chasm between the top 10 and below, but really is goes down gradually until the likes of Namibia.
I know it's a big statement, and one I can't back-up, but it's the feeling I have. Look at the England team, most play regularly in the Premiership, which is a higher standard than most of the Japanese players. I think the JWC is a pretty high standard, with strong forward packs, powerful runners and arguably a higher skill level than some professional competitions.