This thread resurrects from the dead, in light of the recent exhibition thread...I don't know if we have a lot of americans on the forum apart from O'Roth but it's always good to have some input from guys in the country, so feel free to chip in.
As one of the biggest potential market in the world, coupled with an already notorious ability to produce freak athletes, the US is a very interesting topic in the oval planet.
Since the last thread, rugby has seen some improvements, mainly its success in 7's and growth of the game domestically particularly at age grade level. The inclusion in the Olympics will certainly offer a huge boost to 7's in terms of tv exposure and more inportantly training facilities/money for the players as the USOC has come flying to aid since the news of the inclusion went public.
The diffusion on fta tv of the first Collegiate Sevens Championship is certainly a step in the right direction as well. However, getting varsity status in colleges would be a major, MAJOR step forward, both in commercial and sport tems...One just has to see the number of people asking if colleges offer rugby scolarships to know some guys are really into the sport.
The following text is from a very very good blog called
www.gainline.us
and is some kind of statement about the game in the US. I think it is spot on.
Read on
Principles for an American Rugby Policy
The purpose of identifying and enmeshing bedrock principles within charter and policy is not to prescribe an organization's activity, but to ground it, to lend experience and even wisdom to ongoing activity and new ventures. In an effort to elucidate the few principles on which any successful rugby policy in America must be grounded, I recently reviewed writings on the 2009 season and then backtracked further, while also drawing on the work of colleagues at Rugby Magazine, American Rugby News, and elsewhere. I've also benefited from speaking with many players, coaches, and officials; but any errors of commission or omission must be my own.
1. The nucleus of American rugby is the team, and itspurpose is to provide competition for its members.
The main role of third parties (e.g., referees, league officials, vendors) is to promote competition. Commerce is a byproduct of serving teams.
Decisions about competition are best made by those authorities closest to the competitors, because the game encompasses the diversity of a continental nation.
To the extent that it directs resources away from team competition without delivering practical benefits, the claims of unions on teams are limited.
2.
The leading resource for growth and improvement is the school system, which requires rugby to adopt a mainstream approach to sports.
Junior high, high school, and college teams sanctioned by school authorities enable rugby to systematically access valuable public resources.
Rugby teams, varsity or otherwise, that emulate mainstream sports in providing advanced coaching, facilities, sports science, etc. obtain more of the most valuable resource: athletes. School teams also benefit from scholastic brands.
Elite (i.e., representative or national) teams that replicate the varsity structure better prepare athletes since superior training is more practical than tougher competition. Olympic 7s represents the apotheosis of varsity training and support.
3. The sport is too small for a large number of full-timers, so union administrative and commercial initiatives should be measured according to benefits for teams.
The playing community, even if energized by successful national teams, diminishes its focus when asked to endlessly pay for athletes, coaches, and officials. The game will become 'professional' only when subsidies are no longer necessary.
The purpose of union initiatives is to generate financial returns to seed the growth and improvement of team competition.
The most important commercial opportunities lie in 7s because it is an Olympic sport with a privately managed international tournament, posing no risk to teams.