• Help Support The Rugby Forum :

Transfers Rumours

Agreed, don't see why he'd want to move on from being a backup player at his childhood club, behind an aging galactico, to being a backup player elsewhere behind a dunno, and being coached by a dunno.

To Exeter or Newcastle as a starter would be a very different matter.
 
Agreed, don't see why he'd want to move on from being a backup player at his childhood club, behind an aging galactico, to being a backup player elsewhere behind a dunno, and being coached by a dunno.

To Exeter or Newcastle as a starter would be a very different matter.

I guess depends it Carreras is viewed as Finn back up more and TDG viewed as ahead of Bailey

If Finn is out will it be Carreras at 10 with TDG starting at 15 for example and thats if Arundell is viewed as a pure winger

Also can Tigers pay more?
 
That's fair, I guess he's bumping down to 3rd choice, albeit potentially not for long.
For now though, he's got another year on his contract - would Leicester want to buy him out to play backup?

From a Bath perspective, I'd be sad to see him move on, but not too upset, with Harris, Donoghue and Linegar coming through (all capable 10/15 hybrids), something would have to give at some point anyway.
 
That's fair, I guess he's bumping down to 3rd choice, albeit potentially not for long.
For now though, he's got another year on his contract - would Leicester want to buy him out to play backup?

From a Bath perspective, I'd be sad to see him move on, but not too upset, with Harris, Donoghue and Linegar coming through (all capable 10/15 hybrids), something would have to give at some point anyway.

Depends on what Baths cap situation is

Tigers realistically are prob going to have to get a stop gap 10 like Anscombe which I feel would then give Bailey a pretty good chance of taking over
 
And, of course, all the youngsters who don't get offered a senior contract out of the academy - and those who did, but only last 1 contract length.
Every year, there's plenty of good player lost to the sport, because their current coach doesn't think they'll make it, or that there's just no room in the team he's building.

Take the cream of that crop, and even without any stardust players - spend a year or two honing a squad and a gameplan in the Championship, and it really wouldn't be long before being able to push for promotion - IF the new backers can afford it.
 
Last edited:
You think they had a team before they went down of
1. Sutherland, 2. Langdon, 3. Medrano
4. Batley, 5. Kitchener,
6. Hill, 7. Kevsic, 8. Hatherell
9. Simpson, 10. F.Smith
12. S.Atkinson, 13. Lawrence
11. DVDM, 14. Heward, 15. Shillcock

That backline with a starting 9 would've been lethal
 
You forget how good Worcester's systems were:
6-15 is genuine top 4 material, with most of them academy grads

Langdon and Batley both top draw as well - such a class team/such a shame they didn't have the opportunity to grow
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

Top