Did you even read the article you posted?
He played 6 games at 6 - hardly continuously moving position until he got back to NZ (who then developed him into a centre apparently)?
The talk about playing him elsewhere was just that, talk - it never came to pass so it's clearly irrelevant.
It was clear to everyone that he was a centre/outside back.
Couldn't be bothered responding but I guess I will.
Did you even even read the article I posted? I'm not sure how my point was missed.
My article posted was that Sonny Bill Williams was used at 6 for six games at Toulon, as opposed to 'exclusively at centre'. The article (which is dated November 2010, a relatively similar time as Burgess started playing) features speculation on where he will play Super Rugby from journalists and Wayne Smith:
The All Blacks coaches have been so impressed with the 25-year-old's physical attributes, Smith envisaged Williams could be utilised on the blindside flank of a Crusaders loose trio already comprising Kieran Read and Richie McCaw.
"During Super rugby he may have a crack at other positions, he had six weeks at (No) 6 for Toulon," said Smith as the squad adjusted to a frigid Edinburgh ahead of Sunday's (NZT) test with Scotland at Murrayfield.
"He's a different sort of athlete, he's an athlete where we've just go to see what best suits him - and the team."
Now the point of this article was pointing that there was still speculation - leading into a Rugby World Cup year - whether he would in fact be played as a centre of blindside. Wayne Smith was the assistant couch of the All Blacks, so it's not exactly 'clear to everyone'. Even in this article he was used as a 13 in the previous game. He played one of his Canterbury games at wing and wasn't considered there again until the Rugby World Cup, where they made room for him. The direct comparison between Sonny Bill Williams and Sam Burgess was in the medias speculation of a 'project' resulting in selection. I was never meaning to infer that Sonny Bill Williams had not had more experience than Sam Burgess - however in the eyes of the NZRU's coaches, and the NZ media, he clearly was still considered a project. Again - whether it is reality of not - form in the Top 14 is not supposed to influence NZRU coaching decisions. It is meant to be based on form in NPC/SR...
Again, SBW was approached pre-2008 to play rugby union. Had he played poorly in the Top 14 I'm sure it would have affected NZRU perusing him. I probably didn't give enough credit to his final season in Toulon. However in 2009, the media rhetoric surrounding Sonny Bill Williams was still as a "player with huge potential", rather than a finished product.
When I posted:
"Happened with Sonny Bill Williams as well. However I guarantee it'll get Burgess selected. In SBW's debut season he was selected after 7 games for Canterbury (and of course Canterbury club Belfast..), when Freuan was playing much better. Only a few months ago I heard the idiot Willie Lose claims that the All Blacks wouldn't have won the RWC without their best player SBW (who had ***** all starting time in playoff matches and was used mainly out of position on the wing). It's the annoying thing when media hype genuinely effects selections due to marketing reasons."
I vastly underestimated the pedantic nature of our members. Now I think the thread has probably used its designated page to go off topic. I welcome anyone to PM me as to where exactly I have gone horrifically wrong in this most recent post.
Last edited: