So because you saw the word NZ in there you say I am trolling and because I am a Saffer you are implying I hate NZ? Do you know what they say about presumptions?Firstly over hype means promote or publicize to excess. 1999, 2003 and 2007 NZ teams were disappointing were they not? After all the build up and Adidas posters they did not live up to potential. Is that correct. So yes they were over-hyped. Does that mean I hate NZ. No. I have the biggest respect for them. They have been the best side in the world for the last 13 years and have high standards. But being the no 1 team you will have to eat up what is being said when they fail. It comes with the territory. So please do not generalize because I do not call you a Saffer hater and a troll for saying Pierre Spies was over hyped. Although the guy played well and had a injury and was told you never will play rugby again and still came back from that to compete week in and week out. He was never the same after that but I would not call it over hyped. I would call it a player who almost reach his full potential had a career threatening setback. Same as Jonah Lomuh. During the 1995 WC there was all this hype and did not live up to it all in the final. Over hype is a term used in boxing because promoters use that technique to fill PPV. Good example is just check the Cotto Mayweather bout. I think in rugby we use the term overrated and underrated. Spies and most of those players were overrated. You can add Thompson also to that list. Also overrated.
I don't get comments like that.
), where I am telling you what to do and not do - just calling out things that are mostly unfair. Just like things out in the open, mate.
On the sack of NZ rugby? Where? You mean where I was pointing out the fact where the ref was right and the Chiefs supporters were wrong? Or was it where I also pointed out that Bruce Lawrence made the correct decisions in penalizing the Reds vs the Crusaders?I'm not presuming anything buddy.
If this was the first and only incident, I'd honestly think nothing of it. That's the truth. No BS.
But you're always on the sack of NZ rugby and almost at any stage and thread. (i.e. re: NZ jerseys in the New laws thread). Not trying to impose any apartheid-like laws on you here (though you may or may not like that - okay cheap shot @assuming all Saffas are racist
Either accept it and carry on. Or deny it and continue to troll.
No biggie either way.
Peace.
:lol.
Negative? No. I will say the same things about my country or its players or any other country. I did not call you a sheep shagger yet.Like I said, you seem to always use NZ in a negative light on your part.
I have no problem with anything. Funny you should say that.
And it wasn't a real low blow (why else would I point it out?
haha almost but same conceptA hybrid...
Yeah but back in 1966.
If that's how I saw it, then it is what it is.
Next time I will use Tzarbekistan as a example. Anyone from the Kingdom of Tzarbekistan on here?If that's how I saw it, then it is what it is.
Seemed more than coincidental on my part.
Like I said earlier, no biggie otherwise.
I am.
