S
St Helens RLFC
Guest
Seriously, everyone will laugh at you if you go about calling him the greatest ever.
the truth,Originally posted by The TRUTH!!@Dec 2 2005, 08:33 PM
BigTen your pointless rant makes absolutely no sence.
the 2010 qualification system works out great for both Australia and the rest of Oceana.
The top five nations in Oceana Fiji, New Zealand, Solomon Islands, Tahiti and Vanuatu - will be joined by the winner of a preliminary tournament between American Samoa, Cook Islands, New Caledonia, Papua New Guinea, Samoa and Tonga.
The six will then participate in home and away qualifiers with the winner taking on a fifth-placed side from either South America or Asia for a berth in the 2010 finals.
Australia will finaly get a chance to play plenty of competitive games against well matched opposition giving us a chance to get our top team together on a regular basis and dramatically improve ourselves as an International team.
Whats the point of Australia playing any of the Oceana teams?? so that we can beat our own world records of biggest winning margin or most goals in a game or most goals by a player in a game?????and thats just with our B or C team, what does anyone gain out of that?
New Zealand should have a decent chance of winning that tourny provided they dont get beaten by the Solomon Islands againÂÂÂÂÂ
BigTen=Bunnings Tool of the week....CONGRATULATIONS!! your voucher is in the mail.
The thing is, Australia looks after Australia. All the other **** ant countries in Oceania are FIFA's responsibility, and if I recall correctly, it was them who let us pass into Asia. FIFA know that this will strengthen our national side which will in turn help get the sport off the ground in this country. I'm sure making the game popular in Australia is of a higher priority to FIFA than helping improve the other tiny nations in Oceania that can barely afford to fly their national team from island to island.Originally posted by BigTen@Dec 2 2005, 05:27 PM
Sour grapes? Yeah maybe.
But...
Australia choosing to leave Oceania will result in one thing only and that is that no Oceanian team will ever qualify for the world cup again. As the largest country in Oceania, Australia had a moral obligation to try and improve the level of football in the region. They should have tried to do this rather than cut and run into another confederation.
What should have happened is that Oceania would have become a sub-group of Asia with the top two nations from Oceania qualifying into the second phase of Asian world cup qualifying. This would have resulted in many nations from Oceania believing that they had a realistic chance of at least progressing to the next stage and being exposed to a higher level of football.
It would also continue to give Australia, who is by far the best team in Oceania, a better opportunity of having a fairer run to the world cup and would also expose them to the better level of competition that they deserve.
This compromise is fairer to the confederation and it should have been what Australia pushed for. They have acted selfishly and have not given any thought to what their departure from Oceania would mean for football in this region.
Australia deserve to be at this world cup but the qualification process that they have had to do is very unfair and should have been changed. However Australia does not have a god-given right to be there - I mean look at some of the nations that are not going to be there in Germany next year:
Greece - 2004 European Champions
Turkey - 2002 World Cup Third Place
Nigeria - Quality side
Uruguay - Twice World Cup Champions (eliminated by Australia deservedly but only went out on penalties)
There are loads of other nations that are quality sides that don't make it.
Sour grapes? Uh-uh - selfish Australians more like it.
Pfft...I can do what he can do... Like in your sig. ****. Easy.Originally posted by ALLBLACKS@Dec 3 2005, 11:18 PM
hes Full of Himself ?? well we'll ask ST HELENS, I never seen the guy in Interviews or anything, Just Soccer?? and "Boy" is he ever "BLOODY BRILLIANT"
provided we bid for it An TarbhOriginally posted by An Tarbh@Dec 4 2005, 01:14 PM
If FIFA want to develop football in Australia than they should give them the world cup in 2018.
We are bidding for the next available World Cup.Originally posted by ak47+Dec 5 2005, 01:45 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ak47 @ Dec 5 2005, 01:45 PM)</div><!--QuoteBegin-An Tarbhprovided we bid for it An Tarbh@Dec 4 2005, 01:14 PM
If FIFA want to develop football in Australia than they should give them the world cup in 2018.
Last i checked we have no intensions of bidding for 2018
O'neill has other plans, that take higher priority, in building soccer in OZ
And as you can see.................let O'Neill do what he wants.
He leaves the ARU..........look at them now
He arrives with Aussie Soccer............look at the A-league and a qualifying birth.
No that O'neill does everything.....but you can clearly see he is the right man for the job, thus if he says, bidding for 2018 is premature...........he is right[/b]
which one is that?Originally posted by Wally+Dec 5 2005, 07:23 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Wally @ Dec 5 2005, 07:23 PM)</div>Originally posted by ak47@Dec 5 2005, 01:45 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-An TarbhWe are bidding for the next available World Cup. [/b]@Dec 4 2005, 01:14 PM
If FIFA want to develop football in Australia than they should give them the world cup in 2018.
provided we bid for it An Tarbh
Last i checked we have no intensions of bidding for 2018
O'neill has other plans, that take higher priority, in building soccer in OZ
And as you can see.................let O'Neill do what he wants.
He leaves the ARU..........look at them now
He arrives with Aussie Soccer............look at the A-league and a qualifying birth.
No that O'neill does everything.....but you can clearly see he is the right man for the job, thus if he says, bidding for 2018 is premature...........he is right