Whilst Argentina will undoubtedly improve as a result of their inclusion in the tri-nations (its going to take a while before i get used to calling it the rugby championship). I think it will be a while before they get a win (as in several years). Unless of course Robbie Deans decides to play a team full of debutantes lead by Mr "ulsess-and-boring" (Matt Giteau) like he did against Samoa.
Whilst Argentina will undoubtedly improve as a result of their inclusion in the tri-nations (its going to take a while before i get used to calling it the rugby championship). I think it will be a while before they get a win (as in several years). Unless of course Robbie Deans decides to play a team full of debutantes lead by Mr "ulsess-and-boring" (Matt Giteau) like he did against Samoa.
Argentina already beat Australia on 4 different occasions.
Where did I or anyone say that Argentina had never beaten Australia?
you know what they say about assumption little guy. even if your "assumption" is correct, it is still irrelevant. argentina have not beaten australia since 1997 and have never beaten the springboks or all blacks.
following your/nielsch'slogic the usa should start favorites when rugby is reintroduced at the olympics in rio in 2016 because they won the last rugby gold medal in 1924.
a 15 year old rugby result is as irrelevant as a 88 year old result because none of the players, management or coaching staff that were involved in those results are involved with the respective teams now.
you know what they say about assumption little guy. even if your "assumption" is correct, it is still irrelevant. argentina have not beaten australia since 1997 and have never beaten the springboks or all blacks.
following your/nielsch's logic the usa should start favorites when rugby is reintroduced at the olympics in rio in 2016 because they won the last rugby gold medal in 1924.
a 15 year old rugby result is as irrelevant as a 88 year old result because none of the players, management or coaching staff that were involved in those results are involved with the respective teams now.
u guys get trashed by ireland back in the world cup in auckland .. remember??. the pumas will beat u surelyyou know what they say about assumption little guy. even if your "assumption" is correct, it is still irrelevant. argentina have not beaten australia since 1997 and have never beaten the springboks or all blacks.
following your/nielsch'slogic the usa should start favorites when rugby is reintroduced at the olympics in rio in 2016 because they won the last rugby gold medal in 1924.
a 15 year old rugby result is as irrelevant as a 88 year old result because none of the players, management or coaching staff that were involved in those results are involved with the respective teams now.
The "Rugby Championship" a.k.a Four Nations.
http://www.planetrugby.com/story/0,25883,16024_7451872,00.html
I think they all win with this. Argentina, the Blues, JMH and probably even Racing-Métro. Let us hope he goes back to being the player he was in 2006-07
Oh my god:
9. Weepu
10. Hernandez
12. Nonu
13. Ranger
That's absolutely terrifying