The Jones Boy
First XV
I would rather have John Mitchell coach the ABs again before Blackadder gets anywhere near that team.
May they both rest in peace.
Blackadder is possibly the most stupid human in the world who can still remember to breathe.
I would rather have John Mitchell coach the ABs again before Blackadder gets anywhere near that team.
I'd hate to see Blackadder as an option of All Blacks head coach - I don't even think he's good enough to be the Crusaders coach. Foster is another one who I think would be an awful option as head coach (regardless of the success he has with Hansen) - both Blackadder and Foster have shown an inability to produce winning teams despite having many years to build it. Blackadder inherited arguably the best club rugby team in the world - and he has just driven them downhill. Foster had 8 years of not succeeding with the Chiefs, before Rennie took over and then won back to back titles.
Dave Rennie and Wayne Smith would be a great option. Schmidt has proven how good he is at coaching successfully in both club rugby and has looked extremely positive in international rugby. So for me it's really just those as options. I like Vern Cotter but I think he probably has a bit more to prove. I don't particularly want Gatland.
I would rather have John Mitchell coach the ABs again before Blackadder gets anywhere near that team.
just a question: how do you kiwis feel people (in NZ) would take it if the NZRU picked a non-NZ headcoach ? Would it be seen as an embarrassment, or something too awkward generally speaking, or something along the lines of a big sign of a decline and "what is the world coming to ?"...?
just a question: how do you kiwis feel people (in NZ) would take it if the NZRU picked a non-NZ headcoach ? Would it be seen as an embarrassment, or something too awkward generally speaking, or something along the lines of a big sign of a decline and "what is the world coming to ?"...?
just a question: how do you kiwis feel people (in NZ) would take it if the NZRU picked a non-NZ headcoach ? Would it be seen as an embarrassment, or something too awkward generally speaking, or something along the lines of a big sign of a decline and "what is the world coming to ?"...?
k that's what I thought guys. Always interesting to gather info and analyze the cultural differences in how one people would perceive a specific event/action, and how another people would take it a completely different way. In NZ, Rugby is a religion so everything needs to be local. Over here, provided the foreign coach speaks French fairly well of course, it'd be alright, unless he's English, for obvious reasons. But we don't really know much about Aussies or Saffers at all in France for e.g., and NZ=Rugby for us, simple as that, and we'd likely welcome a kiwi just about alright, especially with the subsequent results that would come. Not to pass judgment whatsoever, but NZ is a small nation where the people have enormous expectations from their national team, and the 'local community' spirit is everything it seems. France is a country that's been open to immigration for the past century roughly and people have a very easy time here accepting others as their own. Heck, in Rugby for e.g. very few people have a hard time accepting foreigners in the national team. The "France for the French !" attitude has disappeared a long time ago, and now this'll get far too off-topic but a crazy-rough sketch goes French Revolution+ Hippie 1960's emancipation of everything/everybody - it's this typical Gallic free spirit, while Common Wealth nations have kept a very traditional, old school values system where country and identity are everything.
I'm going to bed now.
if Hanson wins the RWC... he will definitely stay on to see if he can be the 1st Head coach to win it back to back... which is very possible
i'd like to see King Richard coach the AB at some stage...
Err, as much as I love Ricchie (and he certainly still has it), I hope by 2023 a guy like Matt Todd will be there.