- Joined
- Jan 25, 2013
- Messages
- 12,094
- Country Flag
- Club or Nation
Well they physically couldn't make it bigger before, but if they are making new stands they have the ability to make the pitch wider and longer without offsetting the pitch.
Yes - the plot the stadium is built on is triangular.
So the right hand of the stand (in that picture) is actually limited by how far back it can go, not how high it can go.
As you can see on the left, here:
C'mon when it comes to sheer stupidity nothing quite beats trying to get The Rec properly developed.
Why?
...specifically.
First off it's part of the clubs and cities identity and that counts for a lot.I really don't understand Bath Rugby's and the fans insistence on staying at the Rec. Yes it's a nice location and the "history" and all that. However let's be honest nothing is ever going to happen there, the council and the opposition are as stubborn as ever. Craig should really stick it to them. The only thing holding Bath as a club is the stadium situation.
Better to cut your losses and build a new stadium where you can have a sustainable future.
Lastly where would you build a stadium? Honestly look at the topography of the area surrounding bath (it's in a valley) I don't think it's .
So you'll move a team who's support generally comes from Somerset/Wiltshire further into Gloucestershire which already has it's team?Plenty of room around Cirencester!!!!!!
You ever considered that the Rec's location is largely responsible for the club's popularity?
Worked for Wasps!!!!!!