S
shazbooger
Guest
Anyone think that maybe Parisse looked good BECAUSE Italy were so bad?
Not saying he was, but its possible.
Not saying he was, but its possible.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (gingergenius @ Mar 23 2009, 10:19 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Meh @ Mar 23 2009, 06:30 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (gingergenius @ Mar 23 2009, 05:48 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
why select Thom Evans? He's good by Scottish standards, but I really don't think he's all he's cracked up to be.[/b]
Hmmm. They do field him half the time at full back, running deep kicks back to midfield. So he gets plenty of ball time and everyone thinks he's a penetrating runner.Anyone think that maybe Parisse looked good BECAUSE Italy were so bad?
Not saying he was, but its possible.[/b]
My team for the Six Nations would have to be as follows:
15. Armitage
14. Cueto
13. O'Driscoll
12. Flutey
11. Medard
10. Jones
9. Phillips
1. Jenkins
2. Szarewski
3. Hayes
4. Wyn Jones
5. O'Connell
6. Ferris
7. Dusautoir
8. Parisse[/b]
Contrastingly, you could say Heaslip played well because his entire pack did.[/b]