• Help Support The Rugby Forum :

Six Nations Rugby going behind a TV paywall

Very strange how boxing managed that, I'm not in marketing or anything, so no idea why Boxing works and other sports can't make it work, because I'm sure they would all do it if they could.

The new paywall is coming, 100%. TV licensing just need to work out a strategy of conversion without losing 80% of its current forced customer base
I don't follow boxing, but i imagine certain fighters only face each other now and then which makes it more of an event over other sports.


As for rugby, I do think they need to tone down just how ridiculously heavy they've become. It's too demanding on the body and just not needed.
 
Last edited:
I don't follow boxing, but i imagine certain fighters only face each other now and then which makes it more of an event over other sports.


As for rugby, I do think they need to tone down just how ridiculously heavy they've become. It's too demanding on the body and just not needed.
I think it's worse than that, it alienates children, scares parents, and doesn't add to the sport as a spectacle.

World rugby keeps making changes for safety reasons with no consideration to the reprocessing of those changes, and in a lot of cases makes the game more dangerous.

I was chatting to a friend recently who was advocating for 15 subs, why not the genie is out of the bottle, why not allow a full team to be replaced.

My first instinct was to convert NFL linesman, and have a 12-3 split on my bench so I could replaced my front row after 25-30 mins, then again on 50-55 mins. And that's the consequences of actions world rugby never consider.
 
I think it's worse than that, it alienates children, scares parents, and doesn't add to the sport as a spectacle.

World rugby keeps making changes for safety reasons with no consideration to the reprocessing of those changes, and in a lot of cases makes the game more dangerous.

I was chatting to a friend recently who was advocating for 15 subs, why not the genie is out of the bottle, why not allow a full team to be replaced.

My first instinct was to convert NFL linesman, and have a 12-3 split on my bench so I could replaced my front row after 25-30 mins, then again on 50-55 mins. And that's the consequences of actions world rugby never consider.
Have full replacement would be so American, they don't have the stamina for a full game of sport. Maybe the sport should be renamed from rugby football to American football.
 
Do modern day props have the stamina for 80 mins?
No, and I abhore this idea of a starting and finishing team.

I wouldn't be against creating a law only allowing four subs to be used as "planned replacements" and four for enforced replacements, ie injuries, hia and blood injury replacement, any four out of eight.

I think the bench has been abused to allow almost essentially two different teams to compete.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

Top