F
Fushitsusha
Guest
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Dale @ Sep 29 2009, 02:49 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div>
Yes it can. I think Australia's problem is ignoring rugbys heartlands. Sydney's population is 4million. Sydney has nine rugby league teams, AFL wants to plonk a 2nd team there.. a second team in Sydney would generate more interest than a Melbourne team. West Sydney is a mission to get to the SFS in the Eastern Suburbs and this team can represent the the entire west and north sydney. A team for all the bored polynesians out there lost to rugby league.
Who says Melbourne would work? AFL heartland with a presence of league.
[/b][/quote]
East Sydney, West Sydney and North Sydney are already represented by a team - they're called the NSW Waratahs...
We can't have the NSW Waratahs, and the Western Sydney Rams or whatever... you can't have the state go up against a team that only represents a group of suburbs within a city within that state... it's stupid, really really stupid... and it will further disrupt the Tahs already dwindling fanbase...
The NSWRU just need to put more effort into making rugby attractive in Western Sydney...
And why would North Sydney rugby fans give a f*** about a Western Sydney team?
[/b][/quote]
According to your theory Tasmania and South Australia would be better options than a West Sydney team because we already have a NSW team.
Technically they don't represent the whole of NSW when they are based in Sydney.. most of their fans are from the Eastern Suburbs. Do you think it's easy for rugby fans in Penrith, Parramatta, Campbelltown, parts of North Sydney etc to make it to the SFS? and Southern NSW is Brumbies territory.
The one crowd at ANZ in Western Sydney got the highest Waratahs crowd all year of 32k. Your team abandoned what it represents a couple of years ago and are now just The Brumbies.. no reason why the NSW Waratahs can't do the same.
I think West Sydney Rams and Sydney Waratahs would be better for the game imo. Possibly a Fibros vs Silvertails rivalry, and the people of NSW can choose a team they want to support. Melbourne is AFL mad, the Storm have needed assistance (5-10 million) from news ltd since 1998 just to stay alive.. imo rigged too so they have the best players playing for them under a salary cap.. no surprise the two news ltd (Broncos and Storm) teams have done well every year? Heck I reckon a second Brisbane rugby team would be better than a Melbourne side given the amount of juniors we are producing.
[/b][/quote]
Rugby league has no history in Melbourne and was always destined to fail... Melbourne have a good rugby history and continue to produce talent and there are a lot of ex-pat Kiwis down there...
My 'theory' of course wouldn't apply to Tasmania or South Australia...
[/b][/quote]
Destined to fail? They are in their 4th grand final in a row, their crowds are up and have gotten around 30k to their finals (one of them played on the night of the AFL grand final). Western Force worked because there were rugby starved fans and people who didnt like AFL, Melbourne Storm have done the same in Melbourne. Do you think a Perth rugby league team would be a success in 2012/13?
[/b][/quote]
The Storm bleed money and they don't have a very strong Melbourn fanbase with generally low crowd numbers despite their on field successes. You'll find more rugby supporters down in Melbourne than Storm fans.
AFL will always dominate the Melbourne sporting landscape but there is room for a rugby team.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Fushitsusha @ Sep 28 2009, 08:37 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Dale @ Sep 28 2009, 06:20 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Fushitsusha @ Sep 27 2009, 02:19 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Dale @ Sep 27 2009, 12:33 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (snoopy snoopy dog dog @ Sep 27 2009, 01:15 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Would Sydney be able to support a second team? The Waratahs don't exactly attract fans in their droves.
I agree, a SA franchise in an "Australian" conference seems daft. A Victorian franchise based in Melbourne seems the best option if they can get the financing together. A question I'd have is whether the Australian playing base is large enough to support another team. Should Victoria win out, there'll be a hell of a lot of non-Australian players brought in to all their franchises in order to fill out the rosters.[/b]
Yes it can. I think Australia's problem is ignoring rugbys heartlands. Sydney's population is 4million. Sydney has nine rugby league teams, AFL wants to plonk a 2nd team there.. a second team in Sydney would generate more interest than a Melbourne team. West Sydney is a mission to get to the SFS in the Eastern Suburbs and this team can represent the the entire west and north sydney. A team for all the bored polynesians out there lost to rugby league.
Who says Melbourne would work? AFL heartland with a presence of league.
[/b][/quote]
East Sydney, West Sydney and North Sydney are already represented by a team - they're called the NSW Waratahs...
We can't have the NSW Waratahs, and the Western Sydney Rams or whatever... you can't have the state go up against a team that only represents a group of suburbs within a city within that state... it's stupid, really really stupid... and it will further disrupt the Tahs already dwindling fanbase...
The NSWRU just need to put more effort into making rugby attractive in Western Sydney...
And why would North Sydney rugby fans give a f*** about a Western Sydney team?
[/b][/quote]
According to your theory Tasmania and South Australia would be better options than a West Sydney team because we already have a NSW team.
Technically they don't represent the whole of NSW when they are based in Sydney.. most of their fans are from the Eastern Suburbs. Do you think it's easy for rugby fans in Penrith, Parramatta, Campbelltown, parts of North Sydney etc to make it to the SFS? and Southern NSW is Brumbies territory.
The one crowd at ANZ in Western Sydney got the highest Waratahs crowd all year of 32k. Your team abandoned what it represents a couple of years ago and are now just The Brumbies.. no reason why the NSW Waratahs can't do the same.
I think West Sydney Rams and Sydney Waratahs would be better for the game imo. Possibly a Fibros vs Silvertails rivalry, and the people of NSW can choose a team they want to support. Melbourne is AFL mad, the Storm have needed assistance (5-10 million) from news ltd since 1998 just to stay alive.. imo rigged too so they have the best players playing for them under a salary cap.. no surprise the two news ltd (Broncos and Storm) teams have done well every year? Heck I reckon a second Brisbane rugby team would be better than a Melbourne side given the amount of juniors we are producing.
[/b][/quote]
Rugby league has no history in Melbourne and was always destined to fail... Melbourne have a good rugby history and continue to produce talent and there are a lot of ex-pat Kiwis down there...
My 'theory' of course wouldn't apply to Tasmania or South Australia...
[/b][/quote]
Destined to fail? They are in their 4th grand final in a row, their crowds are up and have gotten around 30k to their finals (one of them played on the night of the AFL grand final). Western Force worked because there were rugby starved fans and people who didnt like AFL, Melbourne Storm have done the same in Melbourne. Do you think a Perth rugby league team would be a success in 2012/13?
[/b][/quote]
The Storm bleed money and they don't have a very strong Melbourn fanbase with generally low crowd numbers despite their on field successes. You'll find more rugby supporters down in Melbourne than Storm fans.
AFL will always dominate the Melbourne sporting landscape but there is room for a rugby team.