Are they? France had a **** poor 6n this year bar the Scotland game and regularly drop games to T2 nations. That games a dead heat in my opinion, France at their best will win handy but France at their best is a rare thing.France are way better than Argentina.
Ireland to het smashed by either nz or south africa
Also to struggle in the pool
I think so,Are they? France had a **** poor 6n this year bar the Scotland game and regularly drop games to T2 nations. That games a dead heat in my opinion, France at their best will win handy but France at their best is a rare thing.
Fair, I think Argentina will play at to a certain level every time and that level is good enough to beat what France showed in Dublin, London and Rome this year, maybe v Wales too. That second "tier" of teams, along with Scotland and Australia, is interesting, they're all capable of beating a few of the "Top 5" but could easily drop a game to the likes of Japan, Fiji or Georgia too, Argentina probably being the least likely to do either.I think so,
Seen nothing to suggest Argentina are anything other than plucky losers - at least France can turn up every now and then.
I mean there's every chance France don't turn up and get hammered, but I think they win.
I thought the same in 2015....I may have been wrong but I wiped the entire incident from my mind.Don't think England have anything at all to worry about in that group... France vs Argentina will be a good contest though.
I thought the same in 2015....I may have been wrong but I wiped the entire incident from my mind.
I think so,
Seen nothing to suggest Argentina are anything other than plucky losers - at least France can turn up every now and then.
I mean there's every chance France don't turn up and get hammered, but I think they win.
Shoulda woulda couldaJust remeber Arg should have won against NZ
Argentina is going to beat England at the World Cup. The only way England made it to the knockout phase of the last world cup was by hosting it. Argentina smashed the Irish, 40 to 20 something, they actually qualified from their group. Argentina specializes in World Cups. The chemistry of this group will peak at the world cup.
England will realize that only taking two scrum halves to the showpiece event of world rugby is a mistake.
I don't understand why it's so common to value previous world cups over the recent results. Argentina haven't beaten England for 10 years, and never in the world cup. Trends are only common in rugby due to its hierarchy remaining more or less the same throughout its history and a relatively small sample of competitive teams.Argentina is going to beat England at the World Cup. The only way England made it to the knockout phase of the last world cup was by hosting it. Argentina smashed the Irish, 40 to 20 something, they actually qualified from their group. Argentina specializes in World Cups. The chemistry of this group will peak at the world cup.
England will realize that only taking two scrum halves to the showpiece event of world rugby is a mistake.
I don't understand why it's so common to value previous world cups over the recent results. Argentina haven't beaten England for 10 years, and never in the world cup. Trends are only common in rugby due to its hierarchy remaining more or less the same throughout its history and a relatively small sample of competitive teams.
Croatia hadn't played a world cup knock out game for 20 years before last year and they reached the final. Everything from the past 3.5 years of international rugby suggests England will beat Argentina, and probably do so without much trouble.
After losing 44-8 to England, or losing to Fidji last November, it's an understandable reaction.That's actually pretty funny. Are things really that dire?
Just remeber Arg should have won against NZ
Lost to aus by 6
and bar a stupid call on sat should have beaten a Bok C side
World ratings should look more like this
NZ
SA
ENG
Wal
Aus
Ireland
Arg
France
Scotland
Wales cant be nr 1 if they;ve never beaten NZ