It's blatantly obvious though that RC is [strike]only[/strike] primarily focusing on the NZ market.
That's blatantly obvious because it's made in New Zealand?
Or is it because it's only announced licenses are of course New Zealand and Australia? HB haven't announced anything as yet, so that part can't be part of the reasoning could it?
Or is it because there's two New Zealand commentators? The other recent Rugby Challenge 2006 game (not related at all) had two British commentators, and the majority of licenses were from the Northern Hemisphere mostly the UK, so was that primarily focused on the UK market only?
I don't seem to remember New Zealand members or anyone from TRF's management feeling negatively or unenthusiastically towards that particular ***le for reasons other than how it played and that was after it was released. I seem to remember that it was being actively supported despite EA being into Rugby also at the time.
The reason no one is saying "exclusive" anymore is because every time someone does they get jumped all over with, "until HB confirm otherwise it's not true"
Try not to be too level headed, sensible or fair, that doesn't always go down well. :lol:
What's particularly funny about that "
HB need to confirm" reply is that if it's confirmed in the next month or two by HB to be fact, it's going to look kind of silly. We're better to play down people's expectations by saying that "
to the best of our knowledge at this time Australia and New Zealand may not feature in RWC 2011". At least if we do that and they somehow are in there, people ill feel happy. The current reply is getting some peoples hopes up.
I personally feel that HB are the team to beat for gameplay and they'll produce an excellent rugby game which is what will likely keep people coming back, they have a track record of it. I feel Sidhe will try hard and I hope their game is good and playable, but they have the most to prove on that front and will likely gladly admit it. I believe they've said they are the underdog on this front.