S
Serge
Guest
SecondedOriginally posted by sanzar@Jan 25 2006, 05:06 PM
Ok, that's it! I vote Los be reinstated!
SecondedOriginally posted by sanzar@Jan 25 2006, 05:06 PM
Ok, that's it! I vote Los be reinstated!
shucks...Originally posted by sanzar@Jan 25 2006, 04:06 PM
Ok, that's it! I vote Los be reinstated!
Originally posted by wow!aframeup!+Jan 25 2006, 04:56 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (wow!aframeup! @ Jan 25 2006, 04:56 PM)</div>Would that be before or after the Secret Service shot you?You see my beef was with lies and counter=productivity by Mario (when he pushed it further by denying it and insulting me - that was it....I bow to no one, hell, I'd knock Bush the f*** out if I ran into him in the street).[/b]
<!--QuoteBegin-Los Lover
lol the los is back in town. every complained about rl 2 not living up to the hype and rc206 is failing as well but seems to be getting off a light more lightly.Â
Originally posted by Ripper+Jan 25 2006, 04:41 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Ripper @ Jan 25 2006, 04:41 PM)</div><!--QuoteBegin-wow!aframeup!Would that before or after the Secret Service shot you? [/b]@Jan 25 2006, 04:56 PM
You see my beef was with lies and counter=productivity by Mario (when he pushed it further by denying it and insulting me - that was it....I bow to no one, hell, I'd knock Bush the f*** out if I ran into him in the street).
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div>Originally posted by wow!aframeup!+Jan 25 2006, 05:49 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (wow!aframeup! @ Jan 25 2006, 05:49 PM)</div>Originally posted by Ripper@Jan 25 2006, 04:41 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-wow!aframeup!@Jan 25 2006, 04:56 PM
You see my beef was with lies and counter=productivity by Mario (when he pushed it further by denying it and insulting me - that was it....I bow to no one, hell, I'd knock Bush the f*** out if I ran into him in the street).
Would that before or after the Secret Service shot you?
Nah! I hear ya ripper - but I'd go down swinging!!
But unless I am los lover himself and have the honour of my posts back and my status etc....I don't see that I have a case to answer from any of you.....that criticism or praise or whatever that everyone is talking is for los lover, if you want to deliver it, you can give me back my name.
"Just give them what they want!"
"But IT IS MY NAME!"
The Crucible
Thanks.
Peace and love.
PS - what was esoj saying!? [/b]
lol the los is back in town. every complained about rl 2 not living up to the hype and rc206 is failing as well but seems to be getting off a light more lightly.[/b]
RL2 isnt in the same league as RC2006. Thats why RC2006 isnt receiving as much stick, because it is a far superior game and not a joke of a sports game.Originally posted by esoj@Jan 25 2006, 05:43 PM
yeah something like that. and you can't have any tissues los because ripper used them all up in your absence and remained a mod somehow.
my point was that everyone rips into rl 2 any review etc but even though it failed to live up to its hype its getting off a lot more lightly than rl 2 did.
Isn't recieving as much stick? Mate, I don't mean to point out the obvious, but it got 4/10 in one mag, and hasn't had a great average just yet.Originally posted by knowsleyroader+Jan 25 2006, 07:49 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (knowsleyroader @ Jan 25 2006, 07:49 PM)</div><!--QuoteBegin-esojRL2 isnt in the same league as RC2006. Thats why RC2006 isnt receiving as much stick, because it is a far superior game and not a joke of a sports game. [/b]@Jan 25 2006, 05:43 PM
yeah something like that. and you can't have any tissues los because ripper used them all up in your absence and remained a mod somehow.
my point was that everyone rips into rl 2 any review etc but even though it failed to live up to its hype its getting off a lot more lightly than rl 2 did.
I always knew you were so wound up cause you had a full sackOriginally posted by wow!aframeup!@Jan 25 2006, 04:27 PM
I am not so easily riled now and am better behaved as I have a significant other now...
Ohhhhhh come on m8, what do magazine reviews have to do with anything ? RL2 got 2 9/10 ratings. So whats that all about ?Originally posted by sanzar+Jan 25 2006, 09:05 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (sanzar @ Jan 25 2006, 09:05 PM)</div>Originally posted by knowsleyroader@Jan 25 2006, 07:49 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-esojIsn't recieving as much stick? Mate, I don't mean to point out the obvious, but it got 4/10 in one mag, and hasn't had a great average just yet. [/b]@Jan 25 2006, 05:43 PM
yeah something like that. and you can't have any tissues los because ripper used them all up in your absence and remained a mod somehow.
my point was that everyone rips into rl 2 any review etc but even though it failed to live up to its hype its getting off a lot more lightly than rl 2 did.
RL2 isnt in the same league as RC2006. Thats why RC2006 isnt receiving as much stick, because it is a far superior game and not a joke of a sports game.
lol!!Originally posted by TheBokke+Jan 25 2006, 09:46 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (TheBokke @ Jan 25 2006, 09:46 PM)</div><!--QuoteBegin-wow!aframeup!I always knew you were so wound up cause you had a full sack@Jan 25 2006, 04:27 PM
I am not so easily riled now and am better behaved as I have a significant other now...Now try and behave so you can stay in the forum.
I have seen you starting to rant already remember what you learnt inmanagement course count to 10 Los [/b]
No (well apart from a few game mag reviewers), but by the same token you guys made this game out to be perfect, and thus far most people have been far less glowing in their appraisal of it... but they are rugby union fans.Originally posted by knowsleyroader@Jan 25 2006, 09:34 PM
I was more refering to people on here and while there have been some negative points raised, I havent seen it take any of the kind of stick that RL2 has on here. Yes I know I am one of the main stick givers to RL2 but I was not alone. Has anyone slammed RC2006 yet to the extent RL2 ?
If people disagree with what I say or have said, there isnt really anything I can do about that. They however can stop listening to what I say or at least take it with a big pinch of salt if they feel they need to.Originally posted by sanzar+Jan 26 2006, 12:31 AM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (sanzar @ Jan 26 2006, 12:31 AM)</div><!--QuoteBegin-knowsleyroaderNo (well apart from a few game mag reviewers), but by the same token you guys made this game out to be perfect, and thus far most people have been far less glowing in their appraisal of it... but they are rugby union fans. [/b]@Jan 25 2006, 09:34 PM
I was more refering to people on here and while there have been some negative points raised, I havent seen it take any of the kind of stick that RL2 has on here. Yes I know I am one of the main stick givers to RL2 but I was not alone. Has anyone slammed RC2006 yet to the extent RL2 ?
Nah you never said it was perfect, but you boys did set it up for a fall in my opinion with the amount of praise you gave it... a bit like that reviewer giving RL2 9/10. I mean St Helen's thread ***led "Rugby Challenge 06 > You", was a bit over the top I thought.Originally posted by knowsleyroader@Jan 25 2006, 11:51 PM
BTW Not sure I said it was perfect, although I did say it was very, very good and I was more than pleasantly surprised by it. Feel free to correct me though if you find my ramblings on it and the word perfect is in there
Opinions are very different and by that token we will always get this kind of situation. Im sure if you had done a pre release review of RL2 I would have disagreed.Originally posted by sanzar+Jan 26 2006, 12:56 AM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (sanzar @ Jan 26 2006, 12:56 AM)</div><!--QuoteBegin-knowsleyroaderNah you never said it was perfect, but you boys did set it up for a fall in my opinion with the amount of praise you gave it... a bit like that reviewer giving RL2 9/10. I mean St Helen's thread ***led "Rugby Challenge 06 > You", was a bit over the top I thought. [/b]@Jan 25 2006, 11:51 PM
BTW Not sure I said it was perfect, although I did say it was very, very good and I was more than pleasantly surprised by it. Feel free to correct me though if you find my ramblings on it and the word perfect is in thereÂ
Well actually, you may not have, because the first few days I had with RL2 I was pretty luke warm about it to be honest... It took me a while to get into before I liked it. Certain things have helped its playability though, like the sliders and me getting a PC controller with a turbo button so I just hold sprint now (seriously, this adds heaps to the gameplay, especially against the AI because your backs don't get caught by forwards anywhere near as much!)... But yeah, you're right in that we'll all have points of contention.Originally posted by knowsleyroader@Jan 26 2006, 12:07 AM
Opinions are very different and by that token we will always get this kind of situation. Im sure if you had done a pre release review of RL2 I would have disagreed.
RL2 for you is still being played.
RL2 for me was over within the first 30 seconds.
Opinions are like arseholes.......we all have one.Originally posted by knowsleyroader+Jan 26 2006, 01:07 AM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (knowsleyroader @ Jan 26 2006, 01:07 AM)</div>Originally posted by sanzar@Jan 26 2006, 12:56 AM
<!--QuoteBegin-knowsleyroaderOpinions are very different and by that token we will always get this kind of situation. Im sure if you had done a pre release review of RL2 I would have disagreed.@Jan 25 2006, 11:51 PM
BTW Not sure I said it was perfect, although I did say it was very, very good and I was more than pleasantly surprised by it. Feel free to correct me though if you find my ramblings on it and the word perfect is in thereÂ
Nah you never said it was perfect, but you boys did set it up for a fall in my opinion with the amount of praise you gave it... a bit like that reviewer giving RL2 9/10. I mean St Helen's thread ***led "Rugby Challenge 06 > You", was a bit over the top I thought.
RL2 for you is still being played.
RL2 for me was over within the first 30 seconds. [/b]
The saying goes:Originally posted by wow!aframeup!@Jan 26 2006, 12:18 AM
Opinions are like arseholes.......we all have one.
I was expecting a passable game and that is wjhat I got. If I had also thought it would be sensational...I wouldn't touch it with a barge pole either.
so I hear ya. [/b]
I think the thing that really did it for me is that I dont think it is as good as RL1 which I was still playing when RL2 was released.Originally posted by wow!aframeup!+Jan 26 2006, 01:18 AM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (wow!aframeup! @ Jan 26 2006, 01:18 AM)</div>Originally posted by knowsleyroader@Jan 26 2006, 01:07 AM
Originally posted by sanzar@Jan 26 2006, 12:56 AM
<!--QuoteBegin-knowsleyroaderOpinions are like arseholes.......we all have one.@Jan 25 2006, 11:51 PM
BTW Not sure I said it was perfect, although I did say it was very, very good and I was more than pleasantly surprised by it. Feel free to correct me though if you find my ramblings on it and the word perfect is in thereÂ
Nah you never said it was perfect, but you boys did set it up for a fall in my opinion with the amount of praise you gave it... a bit like that reviewer giving RL2 9/10. I mean St Helen's thread ***led "Rugby Challenge 06 > You", was a bit over the top I thought.
Opinions are very different and by that token we will always get this kind of situation. Im sure if you had done a pre release review of RL2 I would have disagreed.
RL2 for you is still being played.
RL2 for me was over within the first 30 seconds.
As for RL2......wow! do you hate that game bro!!!! lol! But bear in mind much of your hate is biased, becos you love league so much and wanted it to be so damn good....well, when it fell short you have thought of it since as an enemy that crossed you in the dead of the night and you will not sleep to you have your revenge.
I was expecting a passable game and that is wjhat I got. If I had also thought it would be sensational...I wouldn't touch it with a barge pole either.
so I hear ya.[/b]