- Joined
- Feb 18, 2012
- Messages
- 4,594
- Country Flag
- Club or Nation
Not sure Simmonds' injury is serious. I hope not. He'd be a huge loss for both/either final.With Simmonds going off, and Exeter having the extra game, I wouldn't count them out at all
Not sure Simmonds' injury is serious. I hope not. He'd be a huge loss for both/either final.With Simmonds going off, and Exeter having the extra game, I wouldn't count them out at all
Yeah he looked fine once he got onto his feet. Definitely seemed more like a precaution since the game was more or less over than a genuine injury.Not sure Simmonds' injury is serious. I hope not. He'd be a huge loss for both/either final.
He genuinely is quality, Gopperth joked last week that MOM only went to him as Willis was rested, it's not far from the truth he gets A lot of them, when he doesn't he would be in the run in. He is very good at most things, his Jackling was what initially got him noticed but he's added some good carrying and tackling, his try saver yesterday was unreal.Stephen Jones singing the praises of Jack Willis in the ST today. Was he that good v Bristol? Didn't watch it myself.
Thats pretty hard to disagree with although I wouldn't be upset by Simmonds, Dombrandt Or Earl at 8.Yeah I've been a massive supporter of Hill at 6 for a long time as he is everything that I look for in a blindside but Willis' form can not be ignored.
I'd like:
6. Willis
7. Curry
8. Dombrandt
Personally don't think Earl is quite powerful enough to really be a starting 8 option at international level but Simmonds I agree with. Despite being much smaller than Dombrandt I actually think he does much more damage in the high contact areas due to his relentless leg drive while Dombrandt runs much better lines so does better where defenders are slightly more scarce.Thats pretty hard to disagree with although I wouldn't be upset by Simmonds, Dombrandt Or Earl at 8
It depends what kind of 8 you are looking for, I agree he is never go to be a bulldozer but can see him playing in a similar way to Faletau pre recent injury run.Personally don't think Earl is quite powerful enough to really be a starting 8 option at international level but Simmonds I agree with. Despite being much smaller than Dombrandt I actually think he does much more damage in the high contact areas due to his relentless leg drive while Dombrandt runs much better lines so does better where defenders are slightly more scarce.
I rate Earl very highly but think his caps will have to either come at 7 or more likely, as a specialist 20 who can cover all 3 back row slots to a high standard off the bench.
Don't think Earl's anywhere near as strong as Faletau was and definitely nowhere near as large. Earl's only listed as 102kg. That seems a touch small to me but I can't see him being over 105. You'll struggle to find an 8 who's thrived at international level in the modern era who's been under 110. Don't get me wrong, size and strength isn't everything but at No. 8 it definitely counts for a fair bit. I wouldn't hate to see him at 8 but I think we'd run into the exact same problems that NZ had playing Savea at 8 on the weekend (for reference he's 103kg).It depends what kind of 8 you are looking for, I agree he is never go to be a bulldozer but can see him playing in a similar way to Faletau pre recent injury run.
And I've spent the last couple of years trying (and often failing) to convince the hive mind that Zach, at 6'3 and 112kg isn't necessarily too small - as is so often claimedI don't think there's anything between Earl and Simmonds in the power stakes - nor the size stakes, one is 6ft1 102kg, the other 6ft0 102kg
Disagree on power. Simmonds often carries off 9 directly into high contact areas whereas Earl is usually deployed in the wide channels. That could be purely a difference in play style but... play to your strengths y'know? That said I do still think that Simmonds would be underpowered as an 8 at international level and like Earl will probably be seen as a 20 who can do a job in every back row slot.I don't think there's anything between Earl and Simmonds in the power stakes - nor the size stakes, one is 6ft1 102kg, the other 6ft0 102kg
In fairness Mercer was much lighter when that conversation was going on, and I'd argue the reason he still hasn't really put his hand up for international duty is his lack of power and physicality. Certainly isn't an issue with his skill, speed or workrate.And I've spent the last couple of years trying (and often failing) to convince the hive mind that Zach, at 6'3 and 112kg isn't necessarily too small - as is so often claimed
Yes, he was 105kg in his first season, which has increased each year since. A lack of power has always been (and still is) a perception that simply isn't borne out by reality (unless BillyV is the only #8 he can be compared to)In fairness Mercer was much lighter when that conversation was going on, and I'd argue the reason he still hasn't really put his hand up for international duty is his lack of power and physicality. Certainly isn't an issue with his skill, speed or workrate.