Did Gloucester post a side?
It looks like were told there'd be a delay, so didn't bother releasing the team list (the PRL guy confirmed we had an eligible side) - Worcester did cause....who knows? Maybe they thought they'd force the walkover by saying "Hey look we wanna play"
My recollection of the time-lines:
Saints v Gloucester was cancelled before teams were due to be announced (I don't remember if they did or not anyway). ETA,
yes, they did.
Official announcement re: Sale v Worcs being postponed was around the time teams were supposed to be announced.
Either way, that's not even remotely the point - we were told that Sale could put out a team, but no evidence was provided - which would have been nice.
Quite honestly IMO, given that both teams were supposedly able to put teams on the pitch, the match should have been played on Sunday - but it hasn't, and the rest of my comment stands.
Ultimately, 10 teams said "we can put a team out, here they are"
1 team said "we can't put a team out, and therefore forfeit"
1 team said "we can put a team out, but we're not going to - see ya in 3 day"
Also ultimately, Bath drew against Saracens - and "by rights" that means they shouldn't qualify. Worcester on the other hand, had control of their destiny; fate, rather than rugby, took it out of their hands.