The relevance being he won't be really appreciated until after he's retired and part of the very best backrows of the international game . I thought he was pretty amazing 2010 to 2014. I even remember him in the final of RWC 2015 and getting injured early and probably should have gone off but carried on the full 80.
I think you're doing him a disservice. Not the player of the decade but still lines up along the great number 8s to have played for the ABs. Certainly for the decade as good at and outplayed Vermeulen pre 2015. Pocock was really playing a 7 in an 8 jersey. And even Pocock and RIP Collins walked away without an RWC winners medal, let alone two.
All round top player for me could do it all - great at the line out, think ABs will miss him there. Turnovers, ball carrier, tackler. Sure he made mistakes, but who doesn't and even if his scores were overblown by NZ media, he was rarely not a 7/10 at test level and rarely had a bad game. Sure his only sins as an AB was not winning the series v the Lions and lifting the RWC. Personally I will remember him as a great player and leader of the ABs.
2010- 2014, fair point that's a lot of years, maybe I am doing him a disservice.
But I still think he was criminally overrated for most of his career, which doesn't at all mean he was bad, just that his rating was A lot higher than How good he was.
I absolutely agree that he had a good all round game.
I don't agree with the every player makes mistakes Remark, because for me read really stood out in terms of the severity of mistakes, including missed tackles that lead to tries, and failed offloads when it just simply was not a good time to try and force a pass. Great New Zealand teams are great because they take the right risks at the right times, Read didn't.
I also don't think being Winning teams should count, especially when you look at the other players in those teams and how good they were.
This criticism of players is one of my biggest pet hates in rugby. At that level, if a player is on the wing it's because the game plan requires them to be there and they've been told to be there by the coach. No one in pro rugby is just floating around where they fancy being.
I think you make a good point, but it's not black and white, for two reasons.
1. players will deviate from what the coaches say (that is inevitable because games simply aren't these formulaic predictable things that can be completely covered by the game plan) for the worse, sometimes this means hanging out in the wing more than they should.
2. Players should deviate from what the coaches say for the better when what the coaches say isn't working, which is inevitable at times, some times more than others.