On 1. I am not alone with completely disagreeing with you I think the way forward is to play 2 opensides, win the breakdown and your halfway to winning the match, I don't dislike Lydiate but prefer Warbs at 6 and Tips at 7.
On 3 I also disagree Charteris is unsung, has good stats lineout wise and is excellent in a defensive maul.
On 2 and 4 I will concede and on reflection agree with you.
On 5,6 and 7 it's a bit swings and roundabouts, certainly Baldwin, Lee and Davies are on an upward curve, whilst surely Best and possibly Connor have reached their respective peaks.
Lets be honest mate, we won about twice as many turnovers with Lydiate and Warburton vs South Africa as we did with Tipuric and Warburton vs Australia. Tipuric doesn't steal ball when he plays bigger Southern teams. Henderson gets in over Charteris on physicality as AWJ and him are similar players whereas Henderson throws a spanner into the works. And you said purely on World Cup form. Best had an outstanding world cup so how in god's name can you say he's getting worse. Murray is a year older than Davies and has a better all round game than him. Just because he scored 5 tries it doesn't mask over the weakness in his kicking game. Rhys Webb for me is better than both but we said World Cup form. You've completely botched you're argument that you aren't biased by saying Murray and Best have peaked even though you said world cup form. Did you even watch Ireland play or are you just blind? Same for Lee. I can illustrate why Nel was better by comparing Australia's fortune at scrum time against Wales to Scotland. Lee was shoved around by Sio whereas Nel gave him a torrid time. I think that says it all. Even Andy Howell from the Western Mail isn't this biased. Try watching the other teams cause clearly you just watched Wales this tournament. I mean you've picked 12 Welshies in your team haha. You haven't even made an effort to be impartial.