S
shazbooger
Guest
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Cymro @ Apr 29 2009, 02:11 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div>
But is it? I understand you've been saying it a bit, but I havent seen that anywhere else. Its a good point your making, so I'm just wondering if there is any real foundation to it. One rule for Hines, one for Cussiter. Its not built into their contracts so you'd imagine its because the IRB are recognising the tour.
I'm not saying your full or shite, I'm just wondering if there is any solid articles out there that can put this one to bed once and for all. Ive seen a few on the times or the scotsman etc all of which speculate but none of which talk of a restriction.
Cussiter would still be my choice.
It is known that Cusiter would not be available until after the third game of the tour and therefore he is not worth taking.[/b]
But is it? I understand you've been saying it a bit, but I havent seen that anywhere else. Its a good point your making, so I'm just wondering if there is any real foundation to it. One rule for Hines, one for Cussiter. Its not built into their contracts so you'd imagine its because the IRB are recognising the tour.
I'm not saying your full or shite, I'm just wondering if there is any solid articles out there that can put this one to bed once and for all. Ive seen a few on the times or the scotsman etc all of which speculate but none of which talk of a restriction.
Cussiter would still be my choice.