- Joined
- Dec 13, 2013
- Messages
- 26,246
- Country Flag
- Club or Nation
At the risk of opening a can of shitstorm, I see the Cleveland Indians have RIP'd Chief Wahoo.
At the risk of opening a can of shitstorm, I see the Cleveland Indians have RIP'd Chief Wahoo.
Just spied this on the BBC website:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-devon-36965975
Apparently an academic and native American history expert is calling for Exeter Chiefs to change their name as it promotes our colonial past and appropriates native American culture.
I can follow the point to an extent, but it seems like a step too far to me. It's not as if Exeter are celebrating the colonisation and I'm not convinced that cultural appropriation is a negative thing. Should the All Blacks be made to stop performing the haka as they're a diverse group appropriating one particular culture? Should the Cornish Pirates change name as they're celebrating the nefarious ways of their eye patch wearing namesakes?
IIRC, teams in the states have been under pressure to change their names (e.g. Braves and Redskins), but I don't know if anything has come of it. Come to think of it, the Fighting Irish is surely more offensive.
Thoughts anyone?
I dunno - something like that that puts a spotlight on the hypocrisy, whilst taking the knee and saying "rugby against racism" could swing public opinion very quickly.Makes sense but nothing is going to change sadly.
Not until it affects the Prem's money
Only way it will is if they get some players on board/to raise it with the clubReally this twitter post isn't going to get traction.
This thread has it explained several times but Native American's still exist as a culture (unlike Vikings) and have systematically oppressed by the authorities partially through the stereotypes used by Exeter.Why is Exeter's brand racist? Just is choosing to use a Native American or a Viking or anything for that matter?
Did you actually read anything before writing that utter nonsense?The use of native marketing by non natives is deemed racist. Sounds like a copyright issue to me. Would they say it's racist if they got money out it? Would they say it's racist if they signed off the approved native artwork?
Or is this the modern liberal society saying someone can't use artwork from a time in history because, well just because they don't like it.
So do you believe that people won't be offended by things if they get some money? Or that they would actually sell items that are so highly respected in their culture (the headdress)? As I'd be interested to know if you think our servicemen and women would be fine with people buying and wearing copies of earned uniforms and medals that they fought and died for, as long as someone paid them?The use of native marketing by non natives is deemed racist. Sounds like a copyright issue to me. Would they say it's racist if they got money out it? Would they say it's racist if they signed off the approved native artwork?
Or is this the modern liberal society saying someone can't use artwork from a time in history because, well just because they don't like it.
The use of native marketing by non natives is deemed racist. Sounds like a copyright issue to me. Would they say it's racist if they got money out it? Would they say it's racist if they signed off the approved native artwork?
Or is this the modern liberal society saying someone can't use artwork from a time in history because, well just because they don't like it.
Do you realise that you asked that question immediately after 2 articles that answer it?Why is Exeter's brand racist? Just is choosing to use a Native American or a Viking or anything for that matter?
Wasps to look into call to ban Exeter fans from wearing Native American headdresses at their ground
Supporters group writes to Premiership club about the 'cultural appropriation' with Wasps promising to review their policies regards issue
Wasps will become the first Premiership club to "look into" a call to ban Exeter fans from wearing novelty Native American headdresses at their ground after a supporters group wrote to them about the "cultural appropriation".
Article Continues...