T
thiste
Guest
Yeah.
C'mon England!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Yeah.
[/b]
You should never discard the french & the english... after all they did it before didn't they. I think that was the south sides' mistake.
[/b]
<div class='quotemain'>
You should never discard the french & the english... after all they did it before didn't they. I think that was the south sides' mistake.
[/b]
You still have S.A standing in the way [/b]
<div class='quotemain'> You still have S.A standing in the way [/b]
Wales had a great world cup didn't they? [/b]
That's a fallacy. Neither South Africa nor Australia have been especially strong over the last 4 years - they've been beaten (or drawn against) Ireland, Scotland, Wales, England and France since the 2003 World Cup. New Zealand have by some distance been the best side in world rugby over the last four years, of that there is no doubt. However to lump Australia and South Africa in the same group as unstoppable forces agains the North by virtue of being Tri Nations partners is absurd.north is hardly back. one of them needs to win the world cup for there to be any meanginful change. also one of france and england will be gone next week which means they would have played basically 1 good game in 3 years of getting smashed by southern hemisphere teams. [/b]
Wales had a great world cup didn't they? [/b]
Wales had a great world cup didn't they? [/b]