E
..::ERIC::..
Guest
I don't have a problem with the way you moderate, I was simply saying that in my view 80% is too harsh.
Last time I checket 95% was MOST.Originally posted by Spikey@Jul 7 2005, 01:53 AM
OK, i have read and read and read, EVERYONES oppinion, or should i say insight on this. I come from SA, as you all know, and the thing is 95% of the non-whites are a bit on the scaly side" but MOST of them are not.
Rassie's been captured by aliens?Originally posted by Spikey@Jul 7 2005, 11:00 PM
SPEEL DIE GAME TEN VOLLE
wat do u mean friends its a f***n internet site ball bag harden up soft cockOriginally posted by Rassie@Jun 30 2005, 11:58 PM
First of all, i`m at 70% warn level. Why? This is a question i am asking for decades. Yeap, because i`m a veteran of TRF since the day it was `on air`.
Perhaps i`ve been very blunt about many things you`re taking for good. Perhaps your misjudgment blinded you to see the truth.
Why am i so keen for this TRF?
Bloody easy:
- smth like 90% are true rugby connoisseurs
- lots of friends
- statistics â€" this is where i am the best
- history , not only for this forum but also for the history related to the mighty Boks
P.S: OK, i`m not a one liner as Wally, i`m not a `thousand and .... replies` but then again, check out the truth i`m telling you about.
Ball bag. I like it.Originally posted by nehno2+Jul 9 2005, 02:04 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (nehno2 @ Jul 9 2005, 02:04 PM)</div><!--QuoteBegin-Rassiewat do u mean friends its a f***n internet site ball bag harden up soft cock [/b]@Jun 30 2005, 11:58 PM
First of all, i`m at 70% warn level. Why? This is a question i am asking for decades. Yeap, because i`m a veteran of TRF since the day it was `on air`.
Perhaps i`ve been very blunt about many things you`re taking for good. Perhaps your misjudgment blinded you to see the truth.
Why am i so keen for this TRF?
Bloody easy:
- smth like 90% are true rugby connoisseurs
- lots of friends
- statistics â€" this is where i am the best
- history , not only for this forum but also for the history related to the mighty Boks
P.S: OK, i`m not a one liner as Wally, i`m not a `thousand and .... replies` but then again, check out the truth i`m telling you about.
classicOriginally posted by SaintsFan_Webby+Jul 1 2005, 02:13 AM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (SaintsFan_Webby @ Jul 1 2005, 02:13 AM)</div><!--QuoteBegin-saintsfan24_7I think advertising it counts as advertising.@Jun 30 2005, 01:52 PM
Im not trying to advertise but.....Try this sometime...
Didn't realised you were still around Rassie, haven't seen you for ages.
The only problem I've ever seen is that some of your posts can get a bit racist. Nothing wrong with being blunt about most things though, gets to the point. [/b]
I'll endorse this. Well said C.A.Originally posted by captainamerica@Jul 8 2005, 12:11 PM
I can't speak or read a lick of it and yet the argument is fairly clear:
The history/politics within South African rugby versus the Love of the game itself. Therein rage two fierce passions, one of which being a 'never forget' mentality (I'm sure you League boys know something of that) and the other a more progressive approach that wants to clean the slate and move on.
Both are steeped in reason and logic, though statements from the former scarcely tend to give caution to world perception. They call a spade a spade -- literally.
Rassie, you are completely free here to discuss rugby -- as a fellow Springbok supporter I need you here to help quiet the giant rats and the idiotic kiwis (those are fair statements).
If, however, you want to bring in the politcs and history (and voice your complaints therein - which you are welcome to do) you must realize that first and foremost, you are on a global forum and not just on your computer in South Africa.
You know that some words/phrases do not sit well with other groups of humans.
What's more - how is anyone going to see where you're coming from when you use language that immediately turns them off to what you're trying to say?
Not really no... but by the same token it's not fair that the highest income earners (alot of the time layabouts like Jamie Packer) get to avoid paying the most tax! With the rest of the middle to low income eaners having to foot the bill! Something that has a much bigger effect on the average worker than a couple of dole bludgers who get a measly $200 a week for doin nothin... but you never hear racist white trash complain about it, because for the most part they're too bloody dumb!Originally posted by Rassie@Jul 1 2005, 08:25 PM
THE CHIROPRACTOR101
"maori as lazy unemployed ********"
So, were are they wrong ? Remember the Whangerai treat and so on... Is it fair to pay taxes only for those dumb shits to mock you you in despite.