N
Nickdnz
Guest
Damn foolish for Byrne to plead guilty to be honest. Even dumber for him to receive a ban.
-
Help Support The Rugby Forum :
G
gingergenius
Guest
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Sir. Speedy @ Jan 29 2010, 11:30 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div>
I genuinely think Lee Byrne could play tighthead for Wales and still outmuscle that piece of **** Payne.
I genuinely think Lee Byrne could play tighthead for Wales and still outmuscle that piece of **** Payne.
B
Bullitt
Guest
This decision does seem to me that "you can take Johnson out of the Tigers, but you can't take the Tigers out of Johnson".
It's certainly of more benefit to England then Leicester or serving as punishment to Ospreys. Strange decision.
It's certainly of more benefit to England then Leicester or serving as punishment to Ospreys. Strange decision.
K
King_D'Arcy
Guest
Meh! Who cares? It's not that big a deal. It's not as bad as losing losing Rob Kearney. That'd be terrible!
S
SmokeyMonkey
Guest
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (King D'arcy @ Jan 30 2010, 11:40 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div>
Only because Ireland's backup to Kearney is so ****!
Looks likely to be Hook Fullback with Roberts inside and Shanklin outside. Not looking forward to seeing our back 3 under the high ball though. <_<
Only because Ireland's backup to Kearney is so ****!
Looks likely to be Hook Fullback with Roberts inside and Shanklin outside. Not looking forward to seeing our back 3 under the high ball though. <_<
B
Bullitt
Guest
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (SmokeyMonkey @ Jan 30 2010, 12:00 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div>
Only because Ireland's backup to Kearney is so ****! Looks likely to be Hook Fullback with Roberts inside and Shanklin outside. Not looking forward to seeing our back 3 under the high ball though. <_<
[/b][/quote]
Don't panic... With Wilkinson playing they're all bound to go sailing directly into touch.
Only because Ireland's backup to Kearney is so ****!
Looks likely to be Hook Fullback with Roberts inside and Shanklin outside. Not looking forward to seeing our back 3 under the high ball though. <_<[/b][/quote]
Don't panic... With Wilkinson playing they're all bound to go sailing directly into touch.
G
Gavin
Guest
Why not Halfpenny at full-back? Atleast then you could have a Hook-Roberts partnership in the center, and Hook could still cover some of the full-back duties.
D
DuncTheDoodle
Guest
Aparently Gatland is considerng calling up Dan Evans from the Scarlets. But then nobody should ever trust the Western Mail.
I'd have a back three of Leigh Halfpenny, Shane and Tom James. Would be Aled Brew, but for some reason they haven't included him in the squad.
I'd have a back three of Leigh Halfpenny, Shane and Tom James. Would be Aled Brew, but for some reason they haven't included him in the squad.
G
gingergenius
Guest
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Bullitt @ Jan 30 2010, 12:06 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div>
Only because Ireland's backup to Kearney is so ****! Looks likely to be Hook Fullback with Roberts inside and Shanklin outside. Not looking forward to seeing our back 3 under the high ball though. <_<
[/b][/quote]
Don't panic... With Wilkinson playing they're all bound to go sailing directly into touch.
[/b][/quote]
Whaddya mean? Wilko's kicking tactics are to aim straight at the opposition back 3!
Only because Ireland's backup to Kearney is so ****!
Looks likely to be Hook Fullback with Roberts inside and Shanklin outside. Not looking forward to seeing our back 3 under the high ball though. <_<[/b][/quote]
Don't panic... With Wilkinson playing they're all bound to go sailing directly into touch.
[/b][/quote]
Whaddya mean? Wilko's kicking tactics are to aim straight at the opposition back 3!
B
Bullitt
Guest
that's true, then again even Hook can catch a ball when it's directed straight into his outstretched awaiting arms! :lol:
C
cyRil
Guest
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Bullitt @ Jan 30 2010, 01:45 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div>
...Behind his back.
C
cyRil
Guest
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (King D'arcy @ Jan 30 2010, 11:40 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div>
Lee Byrne Lite.
Lee Byrne Lite.
K
King_D'Arcy
Guest
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (cyRil of Ospreylia @ Jan 30 2010, 05:08 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div>
Lee Byrne Lite.
[/b][/quote]
Half the fat
Lee Byrne Lite.
[/b][/quote]
Half the fat
C
cyRil
Guest
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (King D'arcy @ Jan 30 2010, 05:18 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div>
Lee Byrne Lite.
[/b][/quote]
Half the fat
[/b][/quote]
And talent.
Lee Byrne Lite.
[/b][/quote]
Half the fat
[/b][/quote]
And talent.
K
King_D'Arcy
Guest
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (cyRil of Ospreylia @ Jan 30 2010, 05:24 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div>
Lee Byrne Lite.
[/b][/quote]
Half the fat
[/b][/quote]
And talent.
[/b][/quote]
thrice the lions test caps
Lee Byrne Lite.
[/b][/quote]
Half the fat
[/b][/quote]
And talent.
[/b][/quote]
thrice the lions test caps
C
cyRil
Guest
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (King D'arcy @ Jan 30 2010, 05:42 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div>
Lee Byrne Lite.
[/b][/quote]
Half the fat
[/b][/quote]
And talent.
[/b][/quote]
thrice the lions test caps
[/b][/quote]
But he's not as sexy.
Lee Byrne Lite.
[/b][/quote]
Half the fat
[/b][/quote]
And talent.
[/b][/quote]
thrice the lions test caps
[/b][/quote]
But he's not as sexy.
K
King_D'Arcy
Guest
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (cyRil of Ospreylia @ Jan 30 2010, 05:51 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div>
Lee Byrne Lite.
[/b][/quote]
Half the fat
[/b][/quote]
And talent.
[/b][/quote]
thrice the lions test caps
[/b][/quote]
But he's not as sexy.
[/b][/quote]
Well now that's just silly. Everyone knows that Rob Kearney is a masterpiece! Not a hair out of place
Lee Byrne Lite.
[/b][/quote]
Half the fat
[/b][/quote]
And talent.
[/b][/quote]
thrice the lions test caps
[/b][/quote]
But he's not as sexy.
[/b][/quote]
Well now that's just silly. Everyone knows that Rob Kearney is a masterpiece! Not a hair out of place
D
dullonien
Guest
Sooo ****** off with this decision!
We've now ended up with a situation where delibriate gouging = accientally being on the field for 50 seconds. How was this Byrne's fault? Does every player need to stand on the touchline counting how many players are on the field before returning?
As for who will now play fullback, I'd personally go with Jamie Roberts. I know it's a bit harsh on the bloke, as he hasn't played that position in a while, but it means we can then play Hook and Bishop as centres. Halfpenny could move back, but his performances at fullback recently have been poor. Hook of course could move back, but we then end up with zero attacking prowess in midfield.
The more I think about it, the worse I feel. Arrrrgggg, ffs, stupid f***ing situation to be in......
We've now ended up with a situation where delibriate gouging = accientally being on the field for 50 seconds. How was this Byrne's fault? Does every player need to stand on the touchline counting how many players are on the field before returning?
As for who will now play fullback, I'd personally go with Jamie Roberts. I know it's a bit harsh on the bloke, as he hasn't played that position in a while, but it means we can then play Hook and Bishop as centres. Halfpenny could move back, but his performances at fullback recently have been poor. Hook of course could move back, but we then end up with zero attacking prowess in midfield.
The more I think about it, the worse I feel. Arrrrgggg, ffs, stupid f***ing situation to be in......
B
Bullitt
Guest
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (King D'arcy @ Jan 30 2010, 05:59 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div>
Lee Byrne Lite.
[/b][/quote]
Half the fat
[/b][/quote]
And talent.
[/b][/quote]
thrice the lions test caps
[/b][/quote]
But he's not as sexy.
[/b][/quote]
Well now that's just silly. Everyone knows that Rob Kearney is a masterpiece! Not a hair out of place
[/b][/quote]
Has he also been buggered by Nigel Owens?
Lee Byrne Lite.
[/b][/quote]
Half the fat
[/b][/quote]
And talent.
[/b][/quote]
thrice the lions test caps
[/b][/quote]
But he's not as sexy.
[/b][/quote]
Well now that's just silly. Everyone knows that Rob Kearney is a masterpiece! Not a hair out of place
[/b][/quote]
Has he also been buggered by Nigel Owens?
E
elgringoborracho
Guest
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (dullonien @ Jan 31 2010, 09:14 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div>
What now?
2 weeks = 70 weeks? :blink:
What now?
2 weeks = 70 weeks? :blink:
Similar threads
