L
loratadine
Guest
yeah that is a bad point - still a classic game though in my opinion and the only game thus far which camme close to jlr.
I don't think that the Barbarians not wearing their team socks comes down to an issue of lack of memory space but rather an issue of the programmers not bothering to include due to 1. not caring and/or 2. not having the time.Originally posted by ZoMbIeAsRtOnAuT@Dec 18 2005, 08:27 AM
Cap, the reason most games probably have a generic pair of socks for the baabaas is because of memory space..or lack of.
yeah Jacko, BigTens advice should NOT be ignoredOriginally posted by BigTen@Dec 20 2005, 02:23 PM
Do yourself a favour Jacko and find a copy of Jonah Lomu Rugby - I'll send you my PS copy if you want and if you promise to send it back after you have played it for a while - trust me you don't know what you are missing and it is interesting when you compare some of the more modern rugby games developed on better consoles and with bigger budgets.
It is a shame that EA ddin't take JL Rugby as a benchmark and develop it from there. There isn't ny reason to re-invent the wheel, right?
JLR did so many things well:
- Fast pick up and play action.
- Great conversion and kicking system.
- Superb and logical rucking system (scrums were awful though).
- I loved the lineouts (they still get me wet just thinking about them).
- The in game kicking was also superb - I loved putting in up 'n unders.
- and the list goes on...
It was a shame that none of the recent rugby games were able to build upon this framework.
Both those aspects were far from superb in my opinion... Rucking was ok, but logical? And the conversion kicking system is at the bottom of the pile when compared to most rugby games out there.Originally posted by BigTen@Dec 20 2005, 01:23 PM
Do yourself a favour Jacko and find a copy of Jonah Lomu Rugby - I'll send you my PS copy if you want and if you promise to send it back after you have played it for a while - trust me you don't know what you are missing and it is interesting when you compare some of the more modern rugby games developed on better consoles and with bigger budgets.
It is a shame that EA ddin't take JL Rugby as a benchmark and develop it from there. There isn't ny reason to re-invent the wheel, right?
JLR did so many things well:
- Great conversion and kicking system.
- Superb and logical rucking system (scrums were awful though).
ONUS!?!?!?Originally posted by ak47@Dec 23 2005, 11:23 AM
but the onus is on them to be pro-active, and make sure of it
as said by 'blandusername' - burden of responsibilityOriginally posted by kinkon89+Dec 23 2005, 01:31 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (kinkon89 @ Dec 23 2005, 01:31 PM)</div><!--QuoteBegin-ak47ONUS!?!?!?@Dec 23 2005, 11:23 AM
but the onus is on them to be pro-active, and make sure of it
wats onus?[/b]