M
mohamed_ali12
Guest
Wow...England are shite.
Who knew?
Who knew?
I knewWow...England are shite.
Who knew?[/b]
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (bristol-iain @ Feb 15 2010, 04:12 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Was either going to be him or Mirco BergamascoZanni MOTM.
Even Brian Moore thinks thats the right decision.[/b]
Wow, GingerG and Mite, we really sorted out that "really ****" Italian side now, didn't we?
Thats more or less what I expected. A win is a win. Keeps us in with a chance of being pummelled by Ireland or France or both which is a really exciting prospect for me, oh yes...
/sarcasm.[/b]
Nah. If Ireland do beat England somehow it won't be a thrashing. It'll be a close race for 2nd place.[/b]
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (King D'arcy @ Feb 14 2010, 04:26 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Nah. If Ireland do beat England somehow it won't be a thrashing. It'll be a close race for 2nd place.[/b]
Positives:
* we won
* Armitage looked back to form.
* I didn't get punched in the face.
Negatives:
* Hartley is doing more and more to convince me that Mears is a better player.
* Moody was once again outplayed at the breakdown by his opposite number.
* The forwards were criminally lazy.
* Care needs to catch ball off the top of the lineout
* Wilkinson was **** again, and he didn't even kick goals.
* Cueto looks to have lost a yard of pace. Time to think about blooding Ashton
*I hate Karma.[/b]
I agree, despite Cueto being one of my favorite players, he doesn't have the pace of alot of wingers he's up against. He's got a great rugby brain, picks great lines, good under the high ball and good kicking, but can't get away from the defenders.* Cueto looks to have lost a yard of pace. Time to think about blooding Ashton[/b]
Well, I was right. Italy still are a **** side... you have to be to lose at home to someone as shockingly coached as England.
Seriously, this match was 100% England's fault. We started brightly, and then the Italians had 2 or 3 mins of playing well.
But thenEngland did what Johnson has been hinting at all week. We've heard comments about the weather forecast being rainy; we've picked 5 forwards inc Deacon on the bench; we've heard a lot of rhetoric about bullying them up front, tiring them out, and then scoring tries. So England revert into their Tight Game Playbook. And we get the shockingly awful game we just had, one that gave the Italians a serious chance of winning.
Seriously, whoever is in charge of tactics is full of so much ****. Italy always try to bring teams down to their level. If this is going to happen, you have to make sure you've shown your superiority first so the game is well beyond them. The Irish managed that much. England - no. They bloody-mindedly bored ahead with the notion that they would win the Italy game upfront, which kept the Italians within reach and made the last 15 minutes close.
I can't see how anyone can think that when we are so much better than them in the backs, we should try and beat them through the forwards. It doesn't make any f***ing sense.
Positives:
* we won
* Armitage looked back to form.
Negatives:
* Hartley is doing more and more to convince me that Mears is a better player.
* Moody was once again outplayed at the breakdown by his opposite number.
* The forwards were criminally lazy.
* Care needs to catch ball off the top of the lineout
* Wilkinson was **** again, and he didn't even kick goals.
* Cueto looks to have lost a yard of pace. Time to think about blooding Ashton[/b]
Someone a bit bitter? Saying that is was 100% England's fault is a bit harsh - the Italian's played bloody well.[/b]