raziel_eire
Academy Player
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2005
- Messages
- 252
- Country Flag
- Club or Nation
And what if the Rugby Challenge game doesn't play well? ...what future does that leave for Rugby fans/gamers if HB's game flops?
I've read the comments from people stating that from the leaked gameplay for RC that it looks to play similar to how Sidhe's Rugby League ***les played, which from what I've heard/read (having not played them myself) were not great games. So on past form, RC is not the leading contender... as Mario has intimated at himself.
HB in the past have made good rugby games that play well, R06 and R08 are the best examples of this, so I'd be very hopeful that they can build on this gameplay and the majority of opinion from the few who have played it tend to say this is the case.
In terms of the teams/publishers/budget suggestions, Sidhe have had HES as their publishing partner from the get go whereas HB Studios have not which would have had an impact on budget/resources to put into a game.
It's also stated on the Sidhe forums (confirmed info from Mario) that budget has not been a problem for them... quotes:
"Do you think you have a good budget to make a good game ? Yes. Budget is not a problem.",
"Sidhe isn't licensing anything. HES the publisher is the licensing party. And they have a pretty healthy budget for licenses, while simultaneously giving us a pretty healthy budget for development as well."
It is known that budget has been an issue for HB Studios.
So a comparison between the two in this regard is a little unfair verging on blind.
To do a direct comparison between the best screenshot released from both games does not show an embarassing gulf in difference - you're talking **** there. Some will think that one is better then the other, I happen to think RC has the edge in that department. But as I've said before, when playing the game from a gameplay camera, what use is an up-close screenshot? A still image of the RC gameplay vid and the RWC2011 gameplay screenshots are very comparable in quality.
Based on their past games, I am looking forward to RWC2011 and will buy it and hope it does well. I personally didn't like the overall flow of gameplay in the leaked RC vid, the passing looked a little jittery whilst the tackling looked a little too League-like, but I am still looking forward to it, particularly the content it will provide and hope that the gameplay is good enough to warrant playing through that content.
I'm not going to hope that it flops out of some mis-guided loyalty or fanboism to the game that I might prefer.
So in summary... L8NM, your attitude stinks
I've read the comments from people stating that from the leaked gameplay for RC that it looks to play similar to how Sidhe's Rugby League ***les played, which from what I've heard/read (having not played them myself) were not great games. So on past form, RC is not the leading contender... as Mario has intimated at himself.
HB in the past have made good rugby games that play well, R06 and R08 are the best examples of this, so I'd be very hopeful that they can build on this gameplay and the majority of opinion from the few who have played it tend to say this is the case.
In terms of the teams/publishers/budget suggestions, Sidhe have had HES as their publishing partner from the get go whereas HB Studios have not which would have had an impact on budget/resources to put into a game.
It's also stated on the Sidhe forums (confirmed info from Mario) that budget has not been a problem for them... quotes:
"Do you think you have a good budget to make a good game ? Yes. Budget is not a problem.",
"Sidhe isn't licensing anything. HES the publisher is the licensing party. And they have a pretty healthy budget for licenses, while simultaneously giving us a pretty healthy budget for development as well."
It is known that budget has been an issue for HB Studios.
So a comparison between the two in this regard is a little unfair verging on blind.
To do a direct comparison between the best screenshot released from both games does not show an embarassing gulf in difference - you're talking **** there. Some will think that one is better then the other, I happen to think RC has the edge in that department. But as I've said before, when playing the game from a gameplay camera, what use is an up-close screenshot? A still image of the RC gameplay vid and the RWC2011 gameplay screenshots are very comparable in quality.
Based on their past games, I am looking forward to RWC2011 and will buy it and hope it does well. I personally didn't like the overall flow of gameplay in the leaked RC vid, the passing looked a little jittery whilst the tackling looked a little too League-like, but I am still looking forward to it, particularly the content it will provide and hope that the gameplay is good enough to warrant playing through that content.
I'm not going to hope that it flops out of some mis-guided loyalty or fanboism to the game that I might prefer.
So in summary... L8NM, your attitude stinks