Discussion in '2020 Guinness Six Nations' started by RugbyUSA, Feb 8, 2020.
Also since the introduction of BP's Italy have scored 1....
South Africa in the Six Nations is not a great idea, but it makes sense from a money and time zone standpoint. Japan need to join the Rugby Championship, and Argentina need to join the Americas.
Samoa, Tonga and Fiji need to join the Rugby Championship as well.
While all sane fans don’t want it and it’s unlikely, we can’t be complacent as things are changing.
I don’t care about the Pro 14, but I thought it was ridiculous to have the Saffer teams in it. Nonetheless they’re there and the precedent has been set. A reccie mission or an advance party if you like.
If CVC do get involved they won’t have a controlling stake, but they will be a big voice at the table. If they think it’s a flier, make no mistake the pressure will be right on. Look at how F1 moved away from its traditional heartlands during their involvement .....ignore warnings from history at your peril.
Not the same media outlets though...
Also, the TV rights are up for grabs in other places, not South Africa, there is way another media outlet will be able to outmuscle Supersport in South Africa, I mean, they outmuscled the public broadcaster in every facet you can think of.
If we take South Africa as an individual team, then this most recent report had nothing to do with the broadcasting rights.
if I have it correct the 6 Nations are all equal partners and any change needs to be unanimous , so will Italy vote for the change as it might lead th them being removed from the championship, turkeys voting for Christmas comes to mind.
My understanding was the tv money for super rugby and the rugby championship comes largely from South Africa, so they are effectively subsidising the other nations. Therefore New Zealand and Australia would find it difficult to go it alone.
while South African fans may say they’d rather be in the rugby championship, reality is they’d get more tv viewership in competitions with the same time zone. It’s less travel for them too.
There had to be a limit though, when what nz and aus are getting is outweighed by the player fatigue etc
I agree i really do but i am curious what do italy thik they get out of losing every single 6N game convincingly? Years of playing tier 1 teams, 2 teams in the pro 14(same as scotland) and zero improvment really. If they went down to the tier 2 europe comp where they are winning and competing vs Georgia they might gain more from that or least enjoy winning. Not saying i agree with kicking them out but what do they get from staying in?
Also it does show that tier 2 playing tier 1 does not improve teams unless they have systems all the way down to grassroots.
... but why would South Africa give up their annual home and away ‘Greatest Rivalry in Rugby’ *tm?
It doesn't necessarily mean they would though. The possibility is there that SA may play both RC and 6 Nations as they don't feature the same time of the year. The other possibility is there that SA can still have tests against NZ on a yearly basis, but that it's not connected to a tournament. Maybe call it the Mandela Cup and have a home and away game to decide who wins it...
The travel and time zone factor has always been a huge problem.
they get the ability to finance pro rugby in Italy ,the same as the other countries in the tournament ,
if you think that the function of the 6 N is for Italy to win game , perhaps it is not working , But the function of the 6 N is to finance the game in the NH , just think of the consequences of screwing that up .
Again what Italy actually bring to the table? Are the additional 5 games for their inclusion generating any revenue of note for the other 5 nations?
With the lack progress and even regression of Italy in relative terms is the money even helping Italy?
I'm not going to advocate SA joining the 6 Nations I concur its a stupid idea on logistical, devaluing the RWC and traditional grounds. But adding them and removing Italy on both a financial and competitive nature there's no argument the other 5 nations would not benefit from.
Italy do seem to be producing more talented players than they used to - as a team/squad, though, they don't seem to be making any improvement at all.
there regressing in fact you can argue they as a team are worse than when first joined...
The table makes grim reading, they struggled at first but 2006-13 they showed real improvement with 2 4th place finishes (2009 being a bit shite).
They took a massive step backwards in 2014 with '16 and '17 yielding their two worst results since joining. '18 saw them back to joining tournament results and '19 was a lot better but '20 already has them at -55 with three games to go with England on the last day in Rome....so prospects are already looking shite.
they bring another me in Europe ,and a lovely place to go for a rugby trip, I like Italy in the 6N , they would have to vote themselves out of it as decisions like that have to be unanimous ,, kick Italy out now could see the end of rugby there,
How long was it before France started winning the 5N as it was ?
as far as I am concerned dump the bonus point system altogether.
Why not? what's wrong with an odd number of competitors?
At least it would mean an even number of games - six instead of the current five matches.
Because an odd number of competitors means one team is being rested each week; which works out unfair to someone every year. Whilst having an odd number of games makes no real difference, and the only "unfairness" comes as a result of which matches are home versus away, but otherwise makes no difference whatsoever.
Separate names with a comma.