Perhaps it means that England based players won't be licensed, as their faces are owned by PRL (if you catch my drift) - So Tony Buckley/Geordan Murphy could be unlicensed
Anyone else seeing the word EXCLUSIVE as somthing negative. We all where taught as kids to share
From our perspective it would seem like it would be more expensive to get exclusive rather then reg license, if there is such a thing??, maybe some licensors only give out exclusive???. But if two games had the license it seems like everyone would win in this situation, more exposure for licensors, two companies buying licenses rather then one. For argument sake, lets say an exclusive license cost $200,000.00 and an un exclusive license cost $125,000.00 wouldn't it be better for the licensor to make two sales for $250,000.00 rather then one for $200,000.00 and they would get more exposure being in two games. Very confusing, for us consumers. Or how about Hes and 505 come to an agreement to alternate years of game releases, this would give time to make the game, while we would get a rugby game every year, I would think the rugby game fans are a little more hardcore with there passion for rugby and would have no problem buying a new rugby game every year, while giving the development team more time to work on each ***le, they could both use licenses every other year. Seams like a good idea on paper, there is probably a lot more politics involved, but who knows, sometimes talking things through new ideas can be explored. I have honestly enjoyed both game makers products through out the years and have purchased every rugby game out there from pc, wii, ps3 to xbox and would love to see both version of these games continue to be developed, a fifa vs pes situation, except alternating years. Could be good for everyone.
Cheers and Salud