Is it just me that thinks this was worse than the likes of Warburton's in the WC? This looks intentional, where he picks up one leg, twists, then attempts to drive him into the ground. He even puts his own weight into it, which could have caused a really serious injury if Jones' head had landed in the wrong place. Not saying that Warburton's wasn't potentially dangerous as well, but that was more to do with Warburton going too low, then Clerk's own weight taking over, followed by Warburton not realising and going for the jackle.
As long as there's consistency, then I'm happy. Ulster were probably lucky (or Wales unlucky, however you want to look at it), because if one deserved a red, then so does the other, as well as Bradley's in the 6 nations. That could have changed the game completely.
The problem with tackles such as these, is the twist element. It's perfectly possible to do a good dump tackle without twisting the player, so that the tackled player lands harmlessly on his back, not neck.. Unfortunately some ref's don't seem to differentiate and I've seen some genuine dump tackles yellow carded, but this was dangerous. Despite being angry at the time of Warburton's tackle, and still maintain there was no intent there, his mistake was lifting the legs which always runs the risk of turning the player because the centre of gravity is always going to be above the line of the tackle. Maybe a yellow would have been suffice, but there we go.
There was nothing malicious in it, I'm not even sure it merits a ban as Afoa did bring him down safely (well, it ended out safely)
I'm not so sure about that. Bringing him down safely wouldn't have involved leaving the ground himself to put more weight behind the tackle. I'd argue that letting a player go is safer than that, although both are far from 'bringing him down safely'. The bold element is the important bit, glad he was ok afterwards.