• Help Support The Rugby Forum :

Habana or Rokokoko

habana is definitely better than rokokoko, he is much faster and reads the game better i think.
 
Habana is certainly in a class of his own. He showed in the Semi that he is a great attacker and showed off his pace. He showed in the final, he is also a great defender. He shut down Sackey very well, made it a personal duel
 
quarter final v france and final v england showed they're both equally useless on attack if they don't get the bleedin' ball!
 
Habana wins this debate

but like everybody else habana may have did some big hits and made huge tackles, But you will find his defensive line is wayward. On defense He tends to leave his line and opt to tackle the man on the inside leaving his own man unmarked

Every person is human they have there strength's and they have there weakness..
 
Roko is a winger who does brilliant things, Habana is just brilliance who plays on the wing.[/b]
This says it all for me. Just my opinion, but I think Habana has consistently done it when required. Even when the Boks were down, he'd still score tries for fun.

Adding to that, he's the current world player of the year so obviously others agree.
 
Roko has been consistintly the best for 4 years. His strike rate with trys is really impressive. Habana is a good player, but I wont put him in the same class as Joe unless he keeps it up for another 2 years.
 
Habana id definately way better than Rokocoko as an all round player. Rokocoko goes missing for half the games he plays and has porr skills at catching and kicking and tackling. Habana is a bit faster, especially off the mark and Rokocoko has been coached poorly. He has been focusing on improving ball retention in the tackle and making contact rather than positioning himself to take advantage of open space like Habana does. Habana is also way more committed and is always chasing kicks to put pressure on.
 
habana while good i don't think he can pull off some of the tries rockokco can. habana also relies on intercept tries much like peter hewat did. Habana though defintely does have more to his bow than just his intercept his pace is almost unquestioned but beyond that he really offers nothing. rokocko can often just score something out of nothing like that beatuiful try against wales or as someone else mentioned that try where he beat like 5 guys. tries like that are something habana has shown he just can't do yet. on current form you would have to say habana is ahead but the gap is a lot closer than what people on here think.

also johnny wilkinson is better than anybody.. oh that's right we are talking about try scorers my mistake carry on.
 
Roko has been consistintly the best for 4 years. His strike rate with trys is really impressive. Habana is a good player, but I wont put him in the same class as Joe unless he keeps it up for another 2 years.
[/b]

HAHA YOU MUST BE JOKING. NOT IN THE SAME CLASS GET OUT OF HERE!! :%#%#:
Did watch any of the WC??
 
^^ lol

rocks changed the style of his play over the last couple years imo, to me hes been a more of a physical to what he used to. I think that was his goal a while back. It's good in terms of not staying out on the wing like i did in my early days (lol) but i guess he's not as the same try scoring machine when he first hit the scene. Still a valuable player in any team.

but can't deny that (s)habana has been the form winger this year, dougies the only other winger thats been consistent imo
 
I hate the guy but I sill have to say Habana , if not totally for his speed from 0
 

Latest posts

Top