Disagree completely and I think that is a slight insult towards someone who has religious belief's, people must respect Murray's view even if they disagree with it.
Jonathan Edwards was another who did not participate on Sunday's.
I'm not sure if I buy this, an argument could be made that his decision dosen't hurt anyone else(except maybe his team) and thats vaild so he can do as he chooses if the SRU and his teamates are fine with it. But why does religion get a free pass because it has some ancient poorly and written boring texts to accompany it? As Logorrhea said though this debate is going to go nowhere.
Urm ... yes let's not go there because its people like Logorreha and yourself who will offend religious people. For some the Bible is not some ancient poorly and written boring text book, for some it's a way of life and a lot of people base their morals on the book. The world might be a better place if some of the stuff in the Bible was actually considered by some.
If you can't accept someone's religious views because they differ from yours then it says a lot about a person in my eyes. Criticize Murray all you wish but remember he obviously is a devout Christian and believes Sunday is the Sabbath. It his decision on how he should observe it and people should respect that decision. I am not religious by the way, an agnostic.
Devout Christian Euan Murray has questioned the need for Rugby World Cup matches to be played on Sundays.
Interesting topic; same beliefs as Ian Jones (I think). I personally love a few matches on Sunday.
Murray can do whatver he wants as long as his team was fine with it, I just don't think the same respect would be conveyed to people who chose not to play for other reasons e.g. political reasons
I kinda agree and disagree. There is a much wider variety of reasons, some in my eyes valid and others invalid, in the area of politics that somone could choose not to play for their country.
On the one hand you could have say a white guy from Zimbabwe, who had family killed in the government condoned farm attacks and such, refuses to represent Zimbabwe. Thats alright in my books, same as if a Tibetan refused to represent China.
Then on the other hand you might have a player who refuses to play because the Conservatives raise the VAT percentage, or because they think David Cameron is a ****. Obviously not acceptable.
Why did this turn into some kind of religious debate? The post above mine (that should be ignored) is just completely ridiculous and if I was a religious person it would make me think atheists are morons. *hint* Try reading the article before you post about it...
Keep it on topic. He doesn't want to impose his views on anyone, he was just quoted saying why he wont play on Sunday. If people think it is disrespectful to his team, then fine, but other than that I see no real objection to his actions.
Urm ... yes let's not go there because its people like Logorreha and yourself who will offend religious people.
We did but you guys got all defensive and shut it down I believe. This is a whole new audience though. All the old heads have moved on. This thread will go the same way though.I swear we have a religion thread in which all of this has been argued 100x before.
Disagree completely and I think that is a slight insult towards someone who has religious belief's, people must respect Murray's view even if they disagree with it.
Jonathan Edwards was another who did not participate on Sunday's.
I respect his own views, if he feels that way then fine but I'm just saying that's not me.Disagree completely and I think that is a slight insult towards someone who has religious belief's, people must respect Murray's view even if they disagree with it.
Jonathan Edwards was another who did not participate on Sunday's.