Seriously wtf is that. It's like a 12 year old on Fifa selecting all the highest rated players and not giving a **** about the balance of the team.
Curry is not a ******* 8. He gave England no forward momentum last week. He's a great flanker, who turns the ball over, slows down the opposition and is actually best linking up on the wing. Last week Dombrandt came on and it actually allowed Curry to focus on doing what he does best. That back row is not balanced at all.
Farrell is not a 12 and whenever he plays their he either slows down England's attack or stops it by ******* kicking it. Tuilagi is not a winger and we've already seen that you need wingers to be better aerially and positionally with the 50:22 rule. It's just going to leave England exposed. Even if Farrell does drop back, it means players are out of position. When we shift from attack to defence quickly, it will take time to get back into position leaving space. The opportunities it will give on turn over ball is not worth any benefit (not sure what) we would get in attack. Last week Slade spent most of his time being first receiver instead of Furbank and it meant he couldn't actually do his centre role properly. When Smith came it, it gave balance to the backline and Slade actually got to play properly at centre.
Honestly it's like he picks the names then figures out how to arrange them on it the pitch. Absolutely farce.