<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (An Tarbh @ Feb 26 2009, 05:31 PM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}></div>
Strauss brings up his century with a 6, come in quick time as well.[/b]
Interesting stats (from before this test started):
Mat Inns NO Runs HS Ave BF SR 100 50 4s 6s Ct St
Bell: 46 83 9 3004 199 40.59 5998 50.08 8 19 350 12 44 0
Strauss: 58 107 4 4400 177 42.71 9003 48.87 15 14 546 7 66 0
So, as we know Bell is widely regarded as crap, while Strauss is widely regarded as good. Yet they both have a Test Match batting average in the low 40s, which is a good average but not outstanding.
But then you see - in 83 innings Bell has passed 50 27 times. In 107, Strauss has passed 50 29 times. So Bell is more prolific at hitting half centuries.
But of those, Bell has turned 8 into hundreds, which means he has a conversion rate of just under 30%.
Strauss, on the other hand, has a conversion rate of over 50%.
Which is why of 2 batsmen who both began their England careers in 2004, with similar averages and who've played a roughly similar amount of games, one is considered one of the best openers in the world and the other has been dropped. Strauss is extraordinary given that he's not flashy, and he's not got Pietersen's or even Bell's talent; he has got a miraculous ability to hit hundreds, and most of them have been hugely important to England. What a great cricketer.