Climategate

[durbutter]

 

[O'Rothlain]

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (St Helens RLFC @ Nov 28 2009, 07:13 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div>

You mean you're super serial?[/b]

Ha Ha Ha!
<embed src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:southparkstudios.com:155237" width="480" height="400" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="window" flashVars="autoPlay=false&dist=www.southparkstudios.com&orig=" allowFullScreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" allownetworking="all" bgcolor="#000000"></embed>

 

[zxsw85]

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (O'Rothlain @ Nov 28 2009, 05:48 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div>

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (St Helens RLFC @ Nov 28 2009, 07:13 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>

You mean you're super serial?[/b]

Ha Ha Ha!
<embed src="http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:southparkstudios.com:155237" width="480" height="400" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="window" flashVars="autoPlay=false&dist=www.southparkstudios.com&orig=" allowFullScreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" allownetworking="all" bgcolor="#000000"></embed>
[/b][/quote]

Hahahahaha.

 

[shtove]

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/envi...icle6945445.ece

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE </div>

The Met Office plans to re-examine 160 years of temperature data after admitting that public confidence in the science on man-made global warming has been shattered by leaked e-mails. The new analysis of the data will take three years, meaning that the Met Office will not be able to state with absolute confidence the extent of the warming trend until the end of 2012.

The Government is attempting to stop the Met Office from carrying out the re-examination, arguing that it would be seized upon by climate change sceptics.

The Met Office is confident that its analysis will eventually be shown to be correct. However, it says it wants to create a new and fully open method of analysing temperature data. The development will add to fears that influential sceptics in other countries, including the US and Australia, are using the controversy to put pressure on leaders to resist making ambitious deals for cutting CO2.[/b]

Nothing to see here. Move along.

 

[redunderthebed]

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Jethro @ Nov 26 2009, 12:50 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div>

Oz is taking the issue serious, just had a free study of me house down with a number of issues being raised, power consumption, lack of veranda on the western side of the house, and not having water tanks to start with. Should be in line to grab some of that interest free green loan money in the next few weeks.[/b]

Correct however we cannot do anything and will not do anything. Its a nice gesture and i think in the long run being more enviromentally friendly is good for Australia but it won't do **** for global warming.

That is the great swindle not the science that is solid methinks but government manipulating the populace to extract more money from them