N
NZL Fan
Guest
OK here are my first three games of the challenge on "test" difficulty, 10 overs a side games........Originally posted by ak47+Aug 11 2005, 11:02 AM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (ak47 @ Aug 11 2005, 11:02 AM)</div>Originally posted by NZL fan@Aug 10 2005, 08:15 PM
Originally posted by Los Lover@Aug 10 2005, 05:00 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-NZL fani agree to some extent@Aug 10 2005, 01:00 PM
Started a world cup last night on test hardness (wanted to try the one dayers again).
First game NZL(me) vrs Holland.
Made it a 30 over a side game to try and give the comp. AI time to post a decent score...................
.....I bowled first and in the 17th over I got Holland all out for 8 runs.......
Harris got 7 wickets for 1 runÂ
I won in 5 balls.........needless to say I quit the tourney and went back to playing my saved test match.
against the might of Holland?
well done.
anyway....
playing 50 overs for an odi, or at least 40...is the only way to balance the contest.....I believe odis are actuallt this long in real life anyway. The ai blocks at the beginning of odis to get its confidence up....
No, it is not ideal....but you show it up when you play 30 overs or less as you are doing.
Even Holland are capable of scoring more then 8 runs.................
Reading through the cricket forums on other websites it doesn't appear to make a difference in one dayers whether its set on 50 overs or not.
It basically blocks and then it tries to up the runrate (after 30-40 odd overs of scoring not a lot) by scoring boundaries, but usually this just means wickets fall at an alarming rate.
I just think it is poor programming - confidence quickly goes up and down like a yo yo in the game so it has nothing to do with the computer "getting its confidence up" (ie. it doesn't take 10 overs to get your confidence up in the game, more like a few balls).
Guys on planetcricket.net are pretty good at modding games (even made EA cricket 2004 play very well), so PC players should expect massive improvements in the one day play once they get the time to change things around.
but then again i do not
Have any of you played the world xi series
I chased 50 runs in a 10 over match against Atlantic XI and was taken to the 3rd last ball
Next match - I chased 67 runs in a 10 over match against Oceanic XI..2nd last over
Next match - I chased 69 runs in a 10 over match against Asia XI down to the last over.
Next match i play the northern hemispehere in a test match - I dunno about you guys but this world XI series has got me trembling down to the last few balls...they play harder, better and is realistic in relation to the Holland scoreline...if u think Holland can score more than half a region XI would you an idiot.
also in each of these 10 over matches the most wickets i have taken is 4......so its not as if these scorelines are the max they can get as a team in a longer match.
THIS IS ALL IN TEST LEVEL....so dont come and say a run a ball against these rep teams is easy...coz its not. [/b]
1. vrs African 11: They batted first and scored 12-3 (they were 1-1 of 5 overs)??. I lost one wicket on my way to an easy victory inside 2 overs............
2. vrs Atlantic 11: They won the toss (again) and scored 28-5. I won with 5 overs to spare and 7 wickets standing.
3. vrs Oceanic 11: They won the toss (yet again) and scored 48-7 (Astle a quick fire 26). I got the total with two overs to spare with only 3 wickets in hand.
Now that was a little more difficult. However there were two overs bowled by a spinner (cant remember who) where all his balls were basically beyond reach of my bat (ie. very, very wide but not called as such). So basically I only had 8 overs to chase the total which meant a loss of a few more wickets then I normally do.