Only by virtue of using larger stadiums more frequently than we did....if it was held today in the United States, we would smash the average attendance record
Only by virtue of using larger stadiums more frequently than we did....if it was held today in the United States, we would smash the average attendance record
Only by virtue of using larger stadiums more frequently than we did....
obviously
but I think World Rugby would love to use that number to boost their profile
time of year would be a huge problem
What do you mean having the World Cup on at the same time as the NFL would cause problems?
And yes, I think it could smash attendance records today. But they'll be patient and wait for more public interest to grow so they can get real take off. Also, ideally a US team that might reach the quarters.
Would the NFL be open to scheduling to avoid clashes? Or would they try to squash rugby like puny baby?
The Money and prestige goes to holding it in the USA but if there was going to be a world cup in the Americas then it should be Argentina. They have been the only team from South, North or central America that have consistently performed at the international level and there are few that don't wish enjoy watching the Puma's perform well against European or Australasian opposition.
Lets stop thinking about the dollar and think about the Rugby. The Puma's have always been there despite the many limitations they face. If anyone deserves to host it they do. Lets not give it to a country that couldn't give a toss either way like the USA.
Lets hope that if Argentina gets the world cup that they actually choose Argentinian venues instead of Twickenham as their home stadium.
You are a troll, right?
TBF I can see China taking rugby seriously in the next 20-30 years isn't rugby the sport for the military there or something?