• Help Support The Rugby Forum :

Argentina vs England

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Prestwick @ Jun 14 2009, 03:03 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div>
For the 50 point drubbing against South Africa half of their players were still playing in France and there was a similar case against Italy too.

You have to remember how lucky nations like Wales are for having unrestricted access to their players most times..[/b]
For a recent example, they were beaten comprehensively by an average England side, offering no attacking threat whatsoever. And I think they were only missing Contepomi for that one.

They aren't a top 4 side; that's my point.

New Zealand
South Africa
France
Australia
Ireland
Wales
England
Argentina

would be my rankings... Post world-cup form, they haven't shown anything that puts them above any of the sides I placed above them.
They miss their old coach and Pichot, imo.
 
Actually they were still missing several French based players. Stade Francais were one of the few clubs that released players. Also note that they hadn't played together for about 8 months or so, thats effectively a scratch side you got playing England there at Old Trafford.

No matter how you look at it, Argentina are there at 5th place in the IRB rankings against all the odds. They've earnt that place because they are a good side persevering despite lack of squad match practice and so on.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Sir. Speedy @ Jun 14 2009, 03:01 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div>
Yay, England lose. I so happy...

Still think Argentina are overrated. Definately not one of the 'top four sides in the world' like everybody claims, anymore, regardless of home form. I remember a certain 50-point drubbing against SA last year, and a home loss against Italy.[/b]

And a defeat to us pre-2007 world cup. :lol:
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE ("Sir Speedy")</div>
New Zealand
South Africa
France
Australia
Ireland
Wales
England
Argentina[/b]

I'd say:

New Zealand
South Africa
Australia
Ireland
Wales
France
England
Argentina


Not sure why you rate France so highly atm. Is it just because they beat NZ juniors?
 
Because they're the only NH side since England '03 who've beaten NZ away. Weak side or not, only the French can do it... For some bizaare reason. Also, I believe on form France can beta anyone.

I don't rate Australia at all.
England are just below Wales and Ireland at the moment, and Ireland are above Wales. France also beat us in the 6N, so I don't see why you'd have us above them anyway...
 
We seem to be going off topic.

I think Hernandez was great yesterday. Call me biased, but I rate him the best FH in the game (on a good day, of course), And I liked the scrumhalf for Argentina, Lalanne (?). When was he replaced by Vergallo? The passes seemed a lot crisper than before, which had been making things more difficult for Hernandez.
 
Just watched the highlights. That Camacho try is a beauty! Banahan so solid on his wing too, looks like England have found a gem there! And once more, Armitage is involved in the try, what a player
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (unskilz @ Jun 14 2009, 06:24 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div>
We seem to be going off topic.

I think Hernandez was great yesterday. Call me biased, but I rate him the best FH in the game (on a good day, of course), And I liked the scrumhalf for Argentina, Lalanne (?). When was he replaced by Vergallo? The passes seemed a lot crisper than before, which had been making things more difficult for Hernandez.[/b]

What do you think of attempts to play Hernandez playing at 15 sometimes? Is he more suited at just 10 or 15 only or is he a very versatile back?
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Prestwick @ Jun 14 2009, 11:29 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div>
What do you think of attempts to play Hernandez playing at 15 sometimes? Is he more suited at just 10 or 15 only or is he a very versatile back?[/b]


I think Hernandes is very good at 10
 
Hernandez has been a very poor 10 this year with Stade Français. Ok, the whole team was a mess but Lionel Beauxis looked much better... 

I found he was poor last week too, too much kicking, he wasn't better than Goode on that point. I only saw the highlights of the Yalta game...

To me it's a very rare and talented player, but a bit too "emotional". When he is in a bad mood, he's like a ghost on the field... and he seems unhappy in Paris for months now. It's heatbreaking but maybe he better move out in England. 
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Stillknox @ Jun 14 2009, 11:24 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div>
Hernandez has been a very poor 10 this year with Stade Français. Ok, the whole team was a mess but Lionel Beauxis looked much better... 

I found he was poor last week too, too much kicking, he wasn't better than Goode on that point. I only saw the highlights of the Yalta game...

To me it's a very rare and talented player, but a bit too "emotional". When he is in a bad mood, he's like a ghost on the field... and he seems unhappy in Paris for months now. It's heatbreaking but maybe he better move out in England. [/b]

A touch of the Carlos Spencers, perhaps?
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Sir. Speedy @ Jun 14 2009, 06:42 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div>
Because they're the only NH side since England '03 who've beaten NZ away. Weak side or not, only the French can do it... For some bizaare reason. Also, I believe on form France can beta anyone.

I don't rate Australia at all.
England are just below Wales and Ireland at the moment, and Ireland are above Wales. France also beat us in the 6N, so I don't see why you'd have us above them anyway...[/b]


Hmmm yes, seems beating All Blacks stays as one of the strongest reasons for to be popular and gain more scores towards the first 5 teams of the world

This sounds in benefit of All Blacks
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Stillknox @ Jun 14 2009, 10:24 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div>
Hernandez has been a very poor 10 this year with Stade Français. Ok, the whole team was a mess but Lionel Beauxis looked much better...

I found he was poor last week too, too much kicking, he wasn't better than Goode on that point. I only saw the highlights of the Yalta game...

To me it's a very rare and talented player, but a bit too "emotional". When he is in a bad mood, he's like a ghost on the field... and he seems unhappy in Paris for months now. It's heatbreaking but maybe he better move out in England.[/b]

Couldn't agree more on Hernandez, he's been nowhere near his full potential this year with SF, and I also agree he didn't look to be enjoying his rugby...
The city is Salta btw ;)
 
Found this on another board, should sum the game up perfectly;

Early in second half, shortly after Argentina score their second try, there is a line-out in Argie half. Ref, Alan Lewis, notices blood coming from Steve Brothwicks nose, and all over fornt of his shirt. England medic enters the pitch and attempts to stem the flow of blood, Lewis echoes the thoughts of thousands of England supporters the world over with the phrase

"No I want him changed"
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Prestwick @ Jun 13 2009, 10:37 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div>
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (LeksoRugby @ Jun 13 2009, 11:09 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Good I did not expect Argentina to win England even with small advantage

It's surprising to me[/b]

Argentina is one of the wild frontiers of rugby (the city of Salta is in the middle of nowhere yet manages to jam a 40,000 stadium to the rafters) and is an absolute pig of a country to win in. Everyone, everyone from the All Blacks to England to South Africa have all had to go through hell to register wins when touring over there. Los Pumas respect nobody when you're on their turf. You could have famous tribal dances, you could have won the World Cup twice, you could have legends and what not behind your team but that all means jack when you step out in Argentina.

And thats why they are probably one of the most underated teams in World Rugby sometimes. I find it depressing when people express shock when they win. I really do.
[/b][/quote]

Really nice words man. It's an honor -as an argentinian- to have that kind of recognition for the Pumas. And that's true, the Pumas are a hard opponent when they play in Argentina. It's a shame that they do it just 1 or 2 times by year (actually saturday match was the first time in the year that they play here, and Old Trafford game was their first match in the year).
Last saturday they played with passion just like the did during the RWC2007, that's the most important thing to me -appart of the technical improvement since Manchester game-. That's the main characteristic of our rugby. As Stillknox said, Hernandez is a bit too emotional, that's the way we argentinians are. When we are confident with ourserves we give our best and even more, but when we are in a "bad mood" don't expect a cold mind player.
Since last World Cup the world of rugby doesn't consider Argentina as a suprise anymore, and that's a big problem. People expect the Pumas to show the level they had in France 2007, and they are a bit irregular now, they could play a great match last weekend but then they could have a bad game next week against the French Barbarians. Remember that we lost a leader like Pichot, and some other great player has retired from the national team, like Ignacio Fernandez Lobbe, Gonzalo Longo, Ignacio Corleto, Manuel Contepomi, and Rimas Alvarez announced that next weekend match could be his last one with the Pumas jersey. So there is a lot of new players comming, but some of them haven't international experience, and even there is amateur players like Gonzalo Camacho -who recently signed for Harlequins- and shown a great level anyway. Also, as i said before, this matches against England was the first games for the Pumas this year. England played the six nations and always has his players avaible, even when some important players are in the Lions tour, they have a great team indeed. So there is no comparison.
Argentina have a lot of facts (amateur national league, almost all the Pumas players in Europe, no anual international tournament, just few days to train, etc. etc., etc...). All this things must be considered when someone thinks "ok they were in the 3rd place in the last world cup, and now what?".
 
You'd imagine it'll be a hard few years for the Puma's.

Some serious rebuilding to do but you'd imagine they will do alright. In the long term they will be fine but the IRB has to find them a tournament.
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (elgringoborracho @ Jun 15 2009, 07:04 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div>
The city is Salta btw ;)[/b]

Yalta.  :lol:


Must be bad memories of my history lessons, and the famous conference...

Nice post Uli. I love the passion the Pumas put in their game too. I'll always remember the anthem during the opening game vs France in RWC2007, I was at the stadium and it was a great moment... in their own way, I think the french are a bit like that. Passionate, emotional... and a bit irregular unfortunately. After all we are latin people too...
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (uli85 @ Jun 15 2009, 03:41 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div>
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Prestwick @ Jun 13 2009, 10:37 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (LeksoRugby @ Jun 13 2009, 11:09 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Good I did not expect Argentina to win England even with small advantage

It's surprising to me[/b]

Argentina is one of the wild frontiers of rugby (the city of Salta is in the middle of nowhere yet manages to jam a 40,000 stadium to the rafters) and is an absolute pig of a country to win in. Everyone, everyone from the All Blacks to England to South Africa have all had to go through hell to register wins when touring over there. Los Pumas respect nobody when you're on their turf. You could have famous tribal dances, you could have won the World Cup twice, you could have legends and what not behind your team but that all means jack when you step out in Argentina.

And thats why they are probably one of the most underated teams in World Rugby sometimes. I find it depressing when people express shock when they win. I really do.
[/b][/quote]

Really nice words man. It's an honor -as an argentinian- to have that kind of recognition for the Pumas. And that's true, the Pumas are a hard opponent when they play in Argentina. It's a shame that they do it just 1 or 2 times by year (actually saturday match was the first time in the year that they play here, and Old Trafford game was their first match in the year).
Last saturday they played with passion just like the did during the RWC2007, that's the most important thing to me -appart of the technical improvement since Manchester game-. That's the main characteristic of our rugby. As Stillknox said, Hernandez is a bit too emotional, that's the way we argentinians are. When we are confident with ourserves we give our best and even more, but when we are in a "bad mood" don't expect a cold mind player.
Since last World Cup the world of rugby doesn't consider Argentina as a suprise anymore, and that's a big problem. People expect the Pumas to show the level they had in France 2007, and they are a bit irregular now, they could play a great match last weekend but then they could have a bad game next week against the French Barbarians. Remember that we lost a leader like Pichot, and some other great player has retired from the national team, like Ignacio Fernandez Lobbe, Gonzalo Longo, Ignacio Corleto, Manuel Contepomi, and Rimas Alvarez announced that next weekend match could be his last one with the Pumas jersey. So there is a lot of new players comming, but some of them haven't international experience, and even there is amateur players like Gonzalo Camacho -who recently signed for Harlequins- and shown a great level anyway. Also, as i said before, this matches against England was the first games for the Pumas this year. England played the six nations and always has his players avaible, even when some important players are in the Lions tour, they have a great team indeed. So there is no comparison.
Argentina have a lot of facts (amateur national league, almost all the Pumas players in Europe, no anual international tournament, just few days to train, etc. etc., etc...). All this things must be considered when someone thinks "ok they were in the 3rd place in the last world cup, and now what?".
[/b][/quote]

Speaking about Argentinian passion, I went to the CASi vs SIC a few weeks ago as I'm doing an internship in Buenos Aires at the moment. And man, this was the best game I ever saw. Despite the huge rivalry between those two clubs, you actually had the two groups of supporters singing together and after the game they all went to get drunk together. Amateur rugby really brings the focus on the spirit of the game and you could really sense it that night in San Isidro. And the rugby too was quality, although it doesn't have the intensity of professional clubs, you could really see that the players were giving 200% for their team.
We could all learn a lot from the country who managed to keep that spirit safe and at the same time has one of the deadliest national squads in the world. I saw a lot of young promising players that night, maybe some will be pumas one day!
 
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (Prestwick @ Jun 14 2009, 08:29 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}></div>
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (unskilz @ Jun 14 2009, 06:24 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
We seem to be going off topic.

I think Hernandez was great yesterday. Call me biased, but I rate him the best FH in the game (on a good day, of course), And I liked the scrumhalf for Argentina, Lalanne (?). When was he replaced by Vergallo? The passes seemed a lot crisper than before, which had been making things more difficult for Hernandez.[/b]

What do you think of attempts to play Hernandez playing at 15 sometimes? Is he more suited at just 10 or 15 only or is he a very versatile back?
[/b][/quote]
Hernandez is great at 15 (good in the air, fast, great 1 on 1 tackle) but at 10 he can really show all his class. He has a great boot (kicking for touch, grubbers, up and unders), he is very agile but strong when he crashes, he has great flat passes of either hand, and he can always produce a little something magical (be it a reverse offload, dummy, etc). That is why he is the magician. But at 15 he is great running down the wings and juking players/kicking and receiving the ball to score great tries/set up great tries.

Also people never mention how great of a tackler he is and how strong he is. He is a solid rucker and when he takes the ball into a tackle he holds up very well.

I have watched every game of Hernandez in SF for the last 2 almost 3 seasons along with all his international appeareances and he definitely has what it takes to be the best. But he is a little bit hot/cold. Sometimes, when his team is weak, he can be predictable. Hernandez's main strength is his unpredictability. You never know if he will skip pass, crash the ball himself, dropkick, or crosskick.

Hernandez needs good service from his 9 to really shine.

But yes, sometimes he does really nothing out of the ordinary. I think it is when he is unhappy.
 

Latest posts

Top