RWC2011Fan
Academy Player
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2011
- Messages
- 258
- Country Flag
- Club or Nation
Found this just now:
Last edited by a moderator:
Found this just now:
Namibia that played in CC B section won a test series vs Ireland 2-0 in Namibia and Rhodesia aka Zimbabwe have beaten the All Blacks
record books says Zim has beaten NZ.I met the son of the captain of the Rhodesian side, he lives in Canada now. I had a beer with him before Ireland vs. Canada and we talked about that game. It wasn't a full test unfortunately.
record books says Zim has beaten NZ.
Talking about test status WP beating the B&I Lions was a test status game
Still ZimbabweNo it says Rhodesia beat New Zealand.
Still Zimbabwe
No, Southern Rhodesia is/was not Zimbabwe, just as Italy is not the Roman Empire. They may have occupied the same territory but the political entities are entirely different, and there is nothing at all similar between the rule of the region before 1979 and afterword. Nor to be even more frank is there anything remotely similar to the make up of the team that took the field against the AB's to a side that Zimbabwe would field now.
Edit: Sorry I was wrong when the match was played it was Southern Rhodesia.
Just a name change. Did not get a total different population. It wasn't split into smaller countries. It just changed names to Rhodesia and then to ZIm simple. All under a hundred years. And they were part of the commonwealth/ Roman empire don't exist anymoreWith the colony of Northern Rhodesia no longer in existence, in 1964 Southern Rhodesia reverted to the name Rhodesia.
With the colony of Northern Rhodesia no longer in existence, in 1964 Southern Rhodesia reverted to the name Rhodesia. Just a name change. Did not get a total different population. It wasn't split into smaller countries. It just changed names to Rhodesia and then to ZIm simple. All under a hundred years. And they were part of the commonwealth/ Roman empire don't exist anymore
No. The whites ran after they invaded the farms. Nevertheless, FEAR is an acronym in the English language for "False Evidence Appearing Real. It makes the wolf appear bigger than he actually is. But it is through knowing the truth and exposing their methods that we will fear no more and laugh in the faces of these manipulators, because when we fear something we give it power…And that I refuse to do.Ummmm, yes they did, the country was ruled by a white minority, the name change in 1964 was very significant as Southern Rhodesia became Rhodesia which was an indepedent breakaway state from the UK. Many regarded it as essentially a rogue state, when the country reverted to black majority rule in 1979, the Whites' essentially grabbed their luggage and ran to the planes. Then Mugabe took power and did his best to show how quickly you can ruin a countries infrastructure, health and food production, it's been a fascinating 25 year program he even succesfully implemented cholera!!! A disease that had almost ceased to exist!!!
Edit: I suppose I'll grant you that the current regime, has essentially adopted the prior history of the rugby team to suit their needs, just as many Canadians like to claim "we burnt down the White House in 1812"...which was really a bunch of Brits, with maybe one or two Canadian(the country didn't even offically exist) militia hanging on.
No. The whites ran after they invaded the farms. Nevertheless, FEAR is an acronym in the English language for "False Evidence Appearing Real. It makes the wolf appear bigger than he actually is. But it is through knowing the truth and exposing their methods that we will fear no more and laugh in the faces of these manipulators, because when we fear something we give it power…And that I refuse to do.
I was looking for this match for years!!!The victory was so close that time!!! Very bad luck...damn!
It was but the Pumas were pumped up. Flashy stadium, Diego there a bag of coke if that is not good enough encouragement I dunno what is!The two tries Argentina scored in that game and they were two of the most fortuitous you could see. Never seen New Zealand gift tries so easily. Argentina will be annoyed not to have won that as they will never get such a leg up from the All Blacks ever again.
Just watch this. I doubt none of those players Anton Oliver, Richie McCaw or Doug Howlett have ever been complicit in such a horrendous play like that in their careers ever since. The closest I've seen the great All Blacks look like a pub side.
FEAR not fearThat was a reason for the last wave of exodus by the few who had stayed but many had been leaving before that, also the word "fear" is not an acronym, almost no words in English started as acronyms it's a change from the word fer in Middle English which actually meant sudden calamity and wasn't even an emotion.
I have absolutely no idea what you are on about in the last sentence.
Maybe a good poisoned food for the AB´s, before the RWC 95 final is better.It was but the Pumas were pumped up. Flashy stadium, Diego there a bag of coke if that is not good enough encouragement I dunno what is!
Was looking through some of the results the Pumas achieved before their breakthrough in '07 on this website:
http://rugby-365.blogspot.co.nz/ and I can't help but think, "holy crap!"
New Zealand 25-19 Argentina
Lions 25-25 Argentina
Argentina 50-44 Wales
South Africa 26-25 Argentina
New Zealand 24-20 Argentina- Was NZ fielding a 2nd String side that day or something?
Argentina 25-16 Scotland
Argentina 30-16 Wales
South Africa 37-33 Argentina
Australia 32-25 Argentina
England 24-19 Argentina- They lost, but they scored two tries to nil
Argentina 27-19 Australia
...just to name a few.
You can watch clips from a few of these games here: http://www.youtube.com/user/LasGarzas11/videos
And given how little I know about rugby, I have more questions...
How popular was rugby in Argentina before 2007? Because it seems like they've had a number of sell-out crowds in over the years in fairly large venues, even before joining the Rugby Championship. It seems like the interest was definitely there, or were big rugby matches just a novelty?
On average, how many professionals were in the Argentine squad between 1999 (were sides like Ireland even fully professional in 1999?) and 2005? Specifically against the Lions in '05. If they were missing so many first-choice players, I can imagine the bulk of the side was probably made up by a fair number of amateurs.
When did Argentina become a Tier-1 nation?
Why was Argentina's performance in 2007 such a surprise? I mean, people were calling their pool the 'Pool of Death' because of their inclusion, Ireland were awful, they'd won 5 of the last 6 matches against France (and France's victory was by a single point), and Scotland....well they're Scotland.
Oh, by the way, would anyone happen to have the pool match between Ireland and Argentina from 2003? Final score was 16-15. Also on the lookout for Ireland 21-19 Argentina and Ireland 17-3 Argentina. Mostly interested in them for the fights lol.
On a side note, Canada beat Scotland 26-23 in 2002...interesting