Originally posted by el_tk+Dec 2 2005, 03:11 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE (el_tk @ Dec 2 2005, 03:11 PM)</div>
<!--QuoteBegin-harrison2468
@Nov 30 2005, 10:38 PM
There is the ignorance - none of them played when we were relegated. Sheridan, Contepomi, Pichot, Lipman, Best... were playing for us when we got relegated.
As for Abbott, everyone poaches - http://www.therugbyforum.com/index.php?showtopic=4083.
Noon is actually a great centre, he just isn't getting the service from an inside side. Tindall isn't a great passer. On the Churchill cup a few years ago, he was one of the best performers, and had a great game versus the NZ Maori in that tournament.
Smith is better than Henson. Simple as.
All 3 aren't 'much better' than Henson, just better, and it is simple really; Wales have Ruddock, England have Robinson. Swap them around, and the 6N would had looked very different last year. It is not my fault that AR picks Tindall over Smith.
You are a fool if you think that international caps equals a good player, which is obviously the case as you beliive Henson is. He was the worst nack for Wales last year, just made to look better by media hype.
So this fantastic bunch of threequarters were only signed when all your good players left?
The Churchill cup is an absolute joke. Wow, out of England A, The US, Canada, and the NZ Maori, England A had the best centre. There's an achievement, what with there being no pro-league in the US and none tha I'm aware of in Canada.
Smith and Henson are different kinds of players. Smith is a traditional centre while Henson is used more in the 2nd playmaker role akin to Mauger and Giteau.
I didn't say an international cap equals a good player but I think we'd all agree that international players aren't picked out of a hat, or in some kind of lottery but because the international coaching team percieves them to offer more in certain areas than others.
Henson was not Wales' worst player last year. As I said before, you're just jealous because he doesn't play for Bristol/England. [/b]