<div class='quotemain'>
<div class='quotemain'> <div class='quotemain'> <div class='quotemain'>
Maybe Jonah Lomu, but he would be just an average athlete amongst the NFL circles.
[/b]
What a load of ****! What makes supporters of NFL think that their players are so much bigger stronger and faster than Rugby players? Equal proportions of freakish athletes are born in all countries, not just the US [/b][/quote]
Fcukernaut is right in this regard, there are guys in the nfl who are just physical freaks
Look at guys like vernon davis who is 6 foot 3 Inches 253 lbs and has a 40 time of 4.41 seconds, which is as fast or faster than that or most rugby wingers. And there are guys who are even faster than him. I'm not saying rugby guys arent strong and fast but to be honest NFL guys are just on a different level physically.
[/b][/quote]
...but they can't do 80 minutes with only a 10 minute halftime. Training for American Football is immensly different to that of Rugby training. Gridiron is a sprint...short bursts and then it's over. Rugby you have constant movement with moments of bursts. So, Yes, there may be some "freaks" out there in terms of stats, but they could not play a match of Rugby like they do a game of Football.
[/b][/quote]
Precisely. Rugby as a game is far more rounded and has a far better balance within its players between strength and speed, skill and fitness than NFL. That is clearly the case. However NFL does have some good points like the monstrous hits that all that padding allows.
[/b][/quote]
Thats the defining thing between the two games. Rugby is overall endurance and strength, whereas football is about the speed and the strength for short bursts, not in it for the long hall. Which is why i think you dont see a lot of rugby players out there looking like body builders like you do in football. Usually if you do a lot of endurance you cant get built up as much muscle wise as someone who does sprints and lifts.