• Help Support The Rugby Forum :

A Political Thread pt. 2

If you're going to put a sliding scale on it - then I'd suggest doing it based on size of farm; or percentage of income that relates to farming in the tax returns.

for some back of an envelope maths:
IF you've called Joe Smith, with a 120 acre farm that's been in your family for several generations, and gives you a farming income of £15k pa, which amounts to 80% of your (declared) income - then you are exactly the sort of person who SHOULD be handing the farm on to your kids.
IF you're called James Dyson, with a 36,000 acre farm (or at least, 36,000 acres spread over multiple locations), and gives you a farming income of £4,500k pa, which amounts to 6% of your (declared) income - then you are exactly the sort of person who should be paying inheritance tax instead.

So take the average farm size (IIRC about 200 acres) - farms smaller than that can be handed on; farms double that pay half, farms triple pay full-wack.
Alt. if farming accounts for >75% of your income, you can hand the farm on. 60-75% pays half, <60% pays full-wack.

Of course, there's also the age-old way for landowners to avoid inheritance tax (let's face it, they've been doing it since there was such a thing as inheritance tax) of handing it over to your children when they're in their prime, and you really ought to have 7+ years to live. TBH, this should be the case even more the last few decades of life expectancy in the 80s, rather than 60s. If you're keeping the farm until you die, there's a decent chance that your kids will be retiring before they inherit.
Hit 60-65 years old, give the farm to your kids - stay on in an advisory role with as much hands-on as everyone wants.
Of course, the other argument I hear a lot of (anectode warning) is "farming's hard, and my kids don't WANT to take over the farm" - in which case, why on earth do you think they have a right to avoid inheritance tax? The purpose of the exemption is to keep it in the family because the family wants to continue being farmers.

And finally, farmer's lose out (from me) by continuing to hero-worship Nigel Garage who caused the bulk of this mess in the first place - and is almost certainly one of the "farmer"s for whom the entire exercise is a tax-dodge.

ETA:
Looks like the 200 acre average I used above is the mean, the median is about 1/4 of that.
467399150_10161418758947278_4698977895437537997_n.jpg
I might be wrong here but those figures are just land value Yes your average farmer is say around 2.3 million. They get pushed above it with other assets for example barns, farming equipment, live stock value etc.

So when other assets are taken into account they are above 3 million.

It's difficult to know who's right on the figures government saying around 500 farms, some other sources the NFU etc 70,000 farms
 
Yeah, there's going to be misinformation on both sides.
The government will know what they're intending (and they absolutely aren't intending to hit family farms that actually will be handed do the next generation of farmer - or they'd have just ditched the exemption entirely) - but will be wanting to put a positive spin on things.
NFU, Farage, Clarkson and the usual suspects are absolutely happy to just invent a figure to mobilise their base.
 
Ultimately, this new £1m Agricultural property relief is really targeted at the Dysons of this world. Also Don't feel sorry for Clarkson one bit. He's in for a shock if he thinks he can just put his farm in a trust, live 7 years and carry on working on it and avoid IHT completely.

We wait to see if these value of farmland decreases in future years which will bring down their value for real farmers.
 
 
Its shorthand for posh boy name. Nobody working or even middle class calls their kid Tarquin.
It's funny)) I understood that it was a metaphor in general but didn't get how it was related to the concrete historical figure.
It's a beautiful name though..not as beautiful as Slavic male names,but also beautiful 🤔
 
Top