Henson is garbage at 10.How you can say Biggar is over hyped is beyond me,for such a young player the guy is class.I really hope gatland gives Biggar a run in the six nations next year.Biggars game mangement is far better than hooks,although i still think hook is a very good 10.The problem for Hook is that he isnt going to figure at 10 for the ospreys so he aint going to get picked there for wales.
Sorry Cymro, but Henson never looked at home at 10 at any higher level than when he played for Swansea in the Premiership before regional rugby. He's a world class 12 on his day, to start shifting him around again would be foolish. Hook's a better 10 than Henson, so if anyone moved back, it would be Hook for me. Anyway, all this talk of Henson is looking pointless, as there's no sign of him at Ospreys training......
Biggar is overhyped, but dopping him for his poorish performance v NZ would be stupid! He's 20 years old and improving rapidly. His distribution wasn't great v NZ, but that has been a strong part of his game since his time at U20 level, so I'd expect that to improve again. The big occasion got to him, and no matter what he said before the match and his overall confidence, I'm not surprised considering his age. I wouldn't be against him getting more gametime in the 6 nations, as he's still got the talent to become a special player, he just needs that breakthrough game for Wales, when he displays his regional form, then I think he'll be allright.
Whats with the attitude?Henson at 10,do me a favour.Have you forgotten about the last time he played 10 for wales away to ireland a few years ago,he was so out of his depth it was cringeworthy.12 is the only position for henson from my point of view.Why do you think everyone is influenced by what a newspaper says?These are my opinions not that of some journo.
Henson was a useless 10. He crabbed across field all day and could never make his mind up what to do. It's true he has all the skills to be a good 10, but that's always been true. For a long time he was adamant he wanted to play 10 (similar to Hook), even though everyone could see he made a much better centre. His international career took off as soon as he switched to 12 permenantly, and it's where his attreibutes are best utilised as he has the power to bosh it up aswell as the vision and distribution skills to release the backs. His kicking as always useful from 12 and his defensive qualities come to the fore.
Why do you say that 10 would be an easier position for him to pick up from again Cymro? It's one of the toughest positions on the pitch, with arguably the most pressure too. He's a 12, always has been, always will be in my eyes.
Do you a favour ... jog on will you.
I don't think people do actually understand that Henson will have to go back to play somewhere ... it would be easy for him to settle back in to playing 10 ... if he hacks it then move him back to 12. I'm not saying he should not play 12 but to start back off it be easier for him to play 10. Remember Henson is starting over again and what he did in the past does not count.
Oh and regarding the newspaper ... its quite true people are influenced by what the papers say. If you read the post carefully you will find I never said that that your opinion was a journalistic one. So chill your beans.
Jog on?lol are you for real.Ill have my opinion if thats ok with you.I wont be chilling any beans either.