Toulousain ex French fan
Academy Player
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2025
- Messages
- 20
I don't.I wonder if Toulouse are better than France
I don't.I wonder if Toulouse are better than France
I know you didn't start the sentiment on showing how to beat England (cba to find it) clearly lost a hell of a lot more recently than winning, not sure why this game should be any more of a blue print to beating England than any of the losses, it's not currently one of life's great mysteries.Thing is it wasn't this game that showed how to beat us. Ireland did it too, it's been apparent for a while. Either get England to bite in and then go out wide or wait for a missed tackle, which is going to come eventually. Slade missed 3, Mitchell missed 5, Itoje missed 3, Curry missed 3. Earl missed 5. Mitchell was the worst, 5/7 missed.
Edit: Apologies to Smith, he didn't miss any. Also updated a few others.
Yes there was one moment where Bielle-Barrey broke down the left and looked certain to score but then Sleightholme remarkably had the pace to cut him off.Shout out to Sleightholme today. The addition of raw pace got us out of a few sticky situations today. Good job Lombroso's theory of crime was disproven for his sake.
I saw a huge step up in physicality this game by England. We'll be vulnerable out wide against "Scottish" flyers/big boys but we'll be going straight through them with Fin leading the way.
All the best tomorrow, mind.
I guess what we learnt from that is LBB isn't as quick as suggested and OS pace is underplayed as LBB has at least a 10 m start and was running in a straight lineYes there was one moment where Bielle-Barrey broke down the left and looked certain to score but then Sleightholme remarkably had the pace to cut him off.
Possibly, didn't LBB have ball in hand, that would make a pretty significant difference, you simply can't run as optionally that way, the difference probably isn't what it's made out to be though.I guess what we learnt from that is LBB isn't as quick as suggested and OS pace is underplayed as LBB has at least a 10 m start and was running in a straight line
Problem is the premature issuing of TDs central contract complicates things somewhat…Half time
Lawrence has had a very good half (even if you were to ignore his try) - allowing him to play his game rather than try and replicate Tuilagi took far too long to click in the coaches minds, but thank God it did
He's also like having an extra flanker at the rucks as well, he's really not afraid to get stuck in
LCD's darts have been poor, we really need to bring through Langdon asap
Haha yeah that was class, I'm a certified Ramos Hater so it was beautiful to seeAlso we are not ignoring his try, sitting down Ramos like that cannot be ignored!
Sleightholme is very quick tbf, but as mentioned above: running with the ball vs not does have an effect, in literally the next phase of play DuPont is running faster than Sleightholme as he breaks down the wing, but OS is definitely the faster of those two in generalI guess what we learnt from that is LBB isn't as quick as suggested and OS pace is underplayed as LBB has at least a 10 m start and was running in a straight line
He's still raw. If Chessum was fit I suspect CCS would have been on the bench in the AIs. I think leaving him there yesterday was the right call with the game swinging around wildly and the backrow being the standouts in the sideIt's odd in the autumn CCS was used alot and looked good and doesnt seem to be in SB's plans now but still has alot to offer.
Yes CCS is only 21...he wouldn't have been starting had everyone been fit. But he's a powerful kid...and will develop his decision making etc...He's still raw. If Chessum was fit I suspect CCS would have been on the bench in the AIs. I think leaving him there yesterday was the right call with the game swinging around wildly and the backrow being the standouts in the side